ASUS, EVGA, Gigabyte & MSI: Four Flagship X58 Motherboards Reviewedby Rajinder Gill on July 15, 2010 10:00 PM EST
Round one of the high-priced enthusiast end of X58 went to EVGA last year, who set the pace with their Classified line of motherboards. While not perfect in every regard, the E759 and E760 broke and set more overclocking records than any other product, elevating the Classified series to must have status in the eyes of overclocking and gaming enthusiasts.
In light of this success, it was clear that ASUS, Gigabyte and MSI would have to go back to the drawing board and come up with new designs to captivate the audience. The launch of Intel’s i7-980X Gulftown together with the availability of SATA 6G and USB 3 controllers from Marvell and NEC provided the excuse for a revamp and here we are a couple of months down the road with everyone vying to capitalize on sales thanks to the longevity of the X58 platform. That’s where we pick up today, we’ve got the very best ASUS, Gigabyte, EVGA and MSI have to offer and have lined up a compare taking a look at basic functionality, overclocking and overall stability.
Meet the contenders:
Now grab a fresh pair of pants before you take a look at the asking prices:
|Motherboard||Chipsets||SATA 6G||USB 3||Price|
|ASUS Rampage III Extreme||X58||Yes||Yes||$379|
|EVGA X58 4 way Classified||X58, 2 x NF200||No||No||$429|
|Gigabyte X58A-UD9||X58, 2 x NF200||Yes||Yes||$699|
|MSI Big Bang-XPower||X58||Yes||Yes||$299|
Eek! $700 for a single socket motherboard? That’s waaay over the top. While we acknowledge there is a market for high-end products, we can’t think of a good reason for why a motherboard designed around a heavily integrated architecture should be priced this high. There nothing radical on or about the UD9 that justifies such expenditure ; like most of the other boards on test here today, the base design is very much de-facto for the platform and identical to lower priced motherboards( apart from the addition of two nVidia NF200 chips to provide four way SLI capabilities).
In general, all these boards do over their $200~$250 counterparts is offer a more robust VRM for heavy overclocking, in some cases a better layout and lastly a more overclocking centric BIOS. As such, these motherboards are worth looking at by those of us that have very specific overclocking needs beyond conventional cooling, or by those that have a mind-set that pays scant regard to cost versus performance ratios. So yes, this is a minority audience article, but we’ll be getting back to our roots straight after – don’t despair!
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
fausto412 - Thursday, July 15, 2010 - linki don't think i've even see a $700 dollar motherboard. For that kind of money it better come with a hot super model to spend a few nights with the poor sap who spends that much.
mrjminer - Thursday, July 15, 2010 - linkActually, it ensures that you will not get a hot super model to spend a few nights with you.
Taft12 - Friday, July 16, 2010 - linkI could really use one of these. I can't remember the last time I had a night I didn't have to spend with a hot super model. Won't they please just let me game?!
nbjknk - Thursday, November 25, 2010 - link
Dear customers, thank you for your support of our company.
Here, there's good news to tell you: The company recently
launched a number of new fashion items! ! Fashionable
and welcome everyone to come buy. If necessary, please$$$$$$$$$$__$$$_$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$ ____$$$_ $$$_____ $$$
Thursday, 21 October 2010 at 9:48 PM
Souka - Friday, July 16, 2010 - linkMaybe Gigabyte's marketing dept. gets it advice from Apple?
Charge more...people will think it's better... ;)
SunSamurai - Friday, July 16, 2010 - linkGigabyte doesnt have anything to offer that accounts for the extra cost, like OSX.
hansmuff - Thursday, July 15, 2010 - linkThe AOpen AK89-Max had this way before Gigabyte.
What is commendable though is that Gigabyte puts this even on their lower-end boards. Great move.
silverblue - Friday, July 16, 2010 - linkSorry, but the Gigabyte BX2000 has that beat by a good few years.
Fuchikoma - Thursday, July 15, 2010 - linkThe branding of these motherboards are getting totally ridiculous and quite comical. What really annoys me about high-end mobos is that the manufacturer spends a lot of time making them aesthetically pleasing, which in turn you spend copious amounts of money, and yet their support software are absolutely horrendous - consisting of a bunch of bad GUI hacks.
Powerlurker - Friday, July 16, 2010 - linkAs far as I can tell, most of these ultra-high-end consumer motherboards are targeted more at competitive benchmarkers than people who actually want to use their computers to do stuff.