3D Movement Algorithm Test

The algorithms in 3DPM employ both uniform random number generation or normal distribution random number generation, and vary in various amounts of trigonometric operations, conditional statements, generation and rejection, fused operations, etc.  The benchmark runs through six algorithms for a specified number of particles and steps, and calculates the speed of each algorithm, then sums them all for a final score.  This is an example of a real world situation that a computational scientist may find themselves in, rather than a pure synthetic benchmark.  The benchmark is also parallel between particles simulated, and we test the single thread performance as well as the multi-threaded performance.

3D Particle Movement Single Threaded

As expected, our ECS board hits the 73.5 mark similar to other FM2A85X boards.

3D Particle Movement MultiThreaded

The ECS A85F2-A Golden takes a distinct lead in our multithreaded test due to the turbo mode used on the board.  In a crude form of Multicore Acceleration, the ECS board will put the A10-5800K CPU to 4.2 GHz under any load except idle, meaning that any memory-independent benchmark is likely to win out against the other motherboards.

WinRAR x64 3.93 - link

With 64-bit WinRAR, we compress the set of files used in the USB speed tests. WinRAR x64 3.93 attempts to use multithreading when possible, and provides as a good test for when a system has variable threaded load.  If a system has multiple speeds to invoke at different loading, the switching between those speeds will determine how well the system will do.

WinRar x64 3.93

Due to the memory issues experienced with the ECS motherboard, it comes bottom of our WinRAR test.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.2 - link

FastStone Image Viewer is a free piece of software I have been using for quite a few years now.  It allows quick viewing of flat images, as well as resizing, changing color depth, adding simple text or simple filters.  It also has a bulk image conversion tool, which we use here.  The software currently operates only in single-thread mode, which should change in later versions of the software.  For this test, we convert a series of 170 files, of various resolutions, dimensions and types (of a total size of 163MB), all to the .gif format of 640x480 dimensions.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.2

Similar to the 3DPM-ST benchmark, the ECS A85F2-A Golden appears middle of the pack on a single threaded, non-memory related benchmark.

Xilisoft Video Converter

With XVC, users can convert any type of normal video to any compatible format for smartphones, tablets and other devices.  By default, it uses all available threads on the system, and in the presence of appropriate graphics cards, can utilize CUDA for NVIDIA GPUs as well as AMD APP for AMD GPUs.  For this test, we use a set of 32 HD videos, each lasting 30 seconds, and convert them from 1080p to an iPod H.264 video format using just the CPU.  The time taken to convert these videos gives us our result.

Xilisoft Video Converter 7

One would assume that a video conversion tool that uses all the threads would crave memory bandwidth, however if the memory can amply feed the CPU, the CPU becomes the limiting factor.  The high CPU speed and low memory speed of the ECS setup cancels each other out, and we get an average result in XVC.

x264 HD Benchmark

The x264 HD Benchmark uses a common HD encoding tool to process an HD MPEG2 source at 1280x720 at 3963 Kbps.  This test represents a standardized result which can be compared across other reviews, and is dependant on both CPU power and memory speed.  The benchmark performs a 2-pass encode, and the results shown are the average of each pass performed four times.

x264 HD Pass 1x264 HD Pass 2

System Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • IanCutress - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    On an open test bed I never get the feeling I'm going to break anything, as long as I have one finger holding the edge of the board. But this size PCB is working its way into quite a few sub-$200 motherboards.
  • CeriseCogburn - Monday, January 14, 2013 - link

    That's why you use your fingertips to support under the edge of the board while inserting ram, the 24 pin power, etc.

    If they're fat, stuff em up against the edge, if you're a thin nerdy geek, they fit under the edge and will get poked by solder points.

    Get a clue.

    Rather don't assemble any more PC's or use both hands.

    The idiotic WHINING is really too much.

    " I can't assemble a PC properly, I need more help.... my motherboard will be flexed... I can't handle it ! "
  • SinxarKnights - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    While I have purchased an ECS board in the past, I've always felt there is something inherently wrong with having to Google BIOS options just to see what they are. No help in the BIOS and the manual is the same. It just says the name of the option in the description.
  • brookheather - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    This article isn't very well written - there are some typos and strangely worded sentences- some examples:

    "Annoyingly, there major thing wrong"

    "For such a price, I would not be remiss in asking for a good look (check)"

    "causing not to POST again"
  • snarfbot - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    its gorgeous
  • ibnMuhammad - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    Thanks for a great review.

    Still don't quite understand though, why benchmark various premium FM2 motherboards for a low to mid-range CPU? Surely most people will use AMD's Trinity with mATX and itx boards, particularly as it's perfect for a HTPC?

    I'm still awaiting FM2 mATX benchmarks, sadly haven't seen any anywhere - unless anyone else has and can point me to the right place?
  • IanCutress - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    The A10-5800K is the top FM2 CPU.
  • CeriseCogburn - Monday, January 14, 2013 - link

    LOL

    goodbye amd
  • mekpro - Wednesday, January 16, 2013 - link

    Me too. I don't quite understand the point in using Trinity with FullATX.
    Trinity should meant to be used for budget gaming system which doesn't had much components. It should also used with HTPC where the size is limited.

    I'm not sure why mITX is not as quite popular as it should be. The advantages of small form factor benefits over board features which is more than enough even for mITX ones.
  • JohnUSA - Sunday, January 13, 2013 - link

    To PatrickPenn:
    May you die and burn in hell for eternity.
    Evil assh0les like you do not deserve to live.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now