CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation And Rendering

Simulation and Science have a lot of overlap in the benchmarking world, however for this distinction we’re separating into two segments mostly based on the utility of the resulting data. The benchmarks that fall under Science have a distinct use for the data they output – in our Simulation section, these act more like synthetics but at some level are still trying to simulate a given environment.

We are using DDR5 memory at the following settings:

  • DDR5-4800(B) CL40

Simulation

(3-1) DigiCortex 1.35 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

(3-2a) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 65x65, 250 Yr

(3-2b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr

(3-2c) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 257x257, 550 Yr

(3-3) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test

(3-4a) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Trains

(3-4b) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Belts

(3-4c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid

When it comes to simulation, the combination of high core frequency and better IPC performance gives Intel's 12th Gen Core series the advantage here in most situations.

Rendering

(4-1) Blender 2.83 Custom Render Test

(4-2) Corona 1.3 Benchmark

(4-3a) Crysis CPU Render at 320x200 Low

(4-3b) Crysis CPU Render at 1080p Low

(4-3c) Crysis CPU Render at 1080p Medium

(4-4) POV-Ray 3.7.1

(4-5) V-Ray Renderer

(4-6a) CineBench R20 Single Thread

(4-6b) CineBench R20 Multi-Thread

(4-7a) CineBench R23 Single Thread

(4-7b) CineBench R23 Multi-Thread

Looking at performance in the rendering section of our test suite, both the Core i7 and Core i5 performed creditably. The biggest factor to consider here is a higher core and thread count plus IPC performance will equal more rendering power.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Power, Office, And Science CPU Benchmark Performance: Encoding and Compression
Comments Locked

196 Comments

View All Comments

  • Qasar - Friday, April 1, 2022 - link

    i still have issues with the intel systems i used to use. lan drivers on x58, and sata on x99. i solved those issues, buy upgrading tthem to ryzen based comps last year. no issues since.. even usb ones.
  • Khanan - Sunday, April 3, 2022 - link

    AMD was already very mature since Zen+, so if you had problems with 3rd gen products it is most likely your own issue. I used Zen 2 without any issues for 2 years now and Zen 3 is even better, millions of others will confirm what I say.
  • Khanan - Sunday, April 3, 2022 - link

    I wanna add: calling a product “beta” that millions of people love and regard just shows you’re living in a world of your own with full ignorance of what anyone else thinks. Good luck
  • Qasar - Sunday, April 3, 2022 - link

    ignore dwade, if irememeber right, he loves intel only. and his posts usually bash amd in some way.
    i have 4 zen comps here, no isses as well.
  • Khanan - Tuesday, April 5, 2022 - link

    It’s puzzling to me why a Intel fan would buy a AMD product, I guess Intel didn’t live up to his expectations.
  • Qasar - Tuesday, April 5, 2022 - link

    my guess, he never really bought one, and is just making crap up, just to bash amd, and proclaim how much better intel is.
  • Zim - Thursday, March 31, 2022 - link

    There is something fundamentally wrong with the concept a processor with gimped cores. I for one don't intend to buy into it.
  • mode_13h - Friday, April 1, 2022 - link

    What do you mean "gimped cores"? Are you talking about the lack of AVX-512?

    Did you know that Intel has been disabling features on their desktop CPUs for at least a decade? Things like vPro, ECC support, and virtualization enhancements have been fused off and limited to people buying the Xeon-branded versions of the same CPUs.

    AMD has also engaged in this, to a lesser extent, reserving ECC support for only their Ryzen Pro APU, as well as a few other features.
  • kickstnd - Saturday, April 2, 2022 - link

    This almost seems to be an Intel Commercial. No mention of the extreme motherboard prices that won't be used for the next CPU, the larger Watercooling needed, the bigger power supply needed, and don't forget the Bigger Electric Bill to boot. You are paying out the A&$ for that little extra performance by not being GREEN.
    I run 3 AMD PCs for Folding@home (#5 on Toms Hardware Team). My utility bill is $450-500/month. I can't imagine how high it would be with Intel CPU spinning the meter.... LOL
  • DannyH246 - Wednesday, April 6, 2022 - link

    Sadly most of Anandtech's articles are just that. Intel Commercials.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now