CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation And Rendering

Simulation and Science have a lot of overlap in the benchmarking world, however for this distinction we’re separating into two segments mostly based on the utility of the resulting data. The benchmarks that fall under Science have a distinct use for the data they output – in our Simulation section, these act more like synthetics but at some level are still trying to simulate a given environment.

We are using DDR5 memory at the following settings:

  • DDR5-4800(B) CL40

Simulation

(3-1) DigiCortex 1.35 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

(3-2a) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 65x65, 250 Yr

(3-2b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr

(3-2c) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 257x257, 550 Yr

(3-3) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test

(3-4a) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Trains

(3-4b) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Belts

(3-4c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid

When it comes to simulation, the combination of high core frequency and better IPC performance gives Intel's 12th Gen Core series the advantage here in most situations.

Rendering

(4-1) Blender 2.83 Custom Render Test

(4-2) Corona 1.3 Benchmark

(4-3a) Crysis CPU Render at 320x200 Low

(4-3b) Crysis CPU Render at 1080p Low

(4-3c) Crysis CPU Render at 1080p Medium

(4-4) POV-Ray 3.7.1

(4-5) V-Ray Renderer

(4-6a) CineBench R20 Single Thread

(4-6b) CineBench R20 Multi-Thread

(4-7a) CineBench R23 Single Thread

(4-7b) CineBench R23 Multi-Thread

Looking at performance in the rendering section of our test suite, both the Core i7 and Core i5 performed creditably. The biggest factor to consider here is a higher core and thread count plus IPC performance will equal more rendering power.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Power, Office, And Science CPU Benchmark Performance: Encoding and Compression
Comments Locked

196 Comments

View All Comments

  • Khanan - Tuesday, April 5, 2022 - link

    The USB problem you’re talking into something big was a big that only affected a small portion of users, don’t blow it out of proportion. And clearly your comment can be viewed as fan nonsense as Intel had its numerous own issues you’re completely ignoring here for your own sake. Suffice to say, PCs aren’t for noobs or people that want perfect experiences, they will always be a bit trouble and shoot.

    If you don’t like it, get a Apple maybe.
  • 29a - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Thank you for including the iGPU tests. It would be nice to see a few more data points like 720p/high and 1080p/low.
  • dwillmore - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    It's hard to take this article seriously when it compares processor prices when it spends more on memory for the Intel system than it does on the processor for the AMD system.
  • lmcd - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    On the flipside, low-end boards for AMD are pretty lacking in IO. B660 boards are competitive with and often superior to X570 boards in IO.

    While obviously choosing a B350 board was my own fault (a couple years back), it's pretty painful to realize that the total available IO from my B350 board is already showing its age. There's tradeoffs here and you should acknowledge them.
  • lmcd - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Point being, you can't normalize platform costs when the platforms are out of step anyway. There's no good way to equalize these platforms.
  • dwillmore - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    There are a range of motherboards for LGA1700. You can get Z690 MBs with either DDR4 or DDR5 memory slots. Sites have done comparisons between the two, we know that these Intel chips benefit from DDR5 and the IGP particularly benefits from it.

    There's no reason anyone sane would pair DDR5 with a low end i5.
  • Mike Bruzzone - Tuesday, April 5, 2022 - link

    @dwillmore

    "There's no reason anyone sane would pair DDR5 with a low end i5", absolutely, and not one PC review site I'm aware has said this specifically, more generally focusing on the price premium.

    Another area that get's my goat that has not been said by PC review sites is if u'r sticking with Windows 10 late market (I am) the choice is V5x, M3x, Comet top bin or 9900K and if you must have Windows 11 'adoptive adaptive then its AL/RL or wait for Zen 4 validation . . . so simple to express simply and precisely. mb
  • yeeeeman - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Finally a sign that Anandtech is coming back!
    I wanna see Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 analysis.
  • gal_shalif - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Please note that only the "big" cores can be counted for performance - while the "little" cores are only relevant for saving energy ...
  • eloyard - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    If your workload has enough threads to cover all cores, it should still better to have them.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now