CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation And Rendering

Simulation and Science have a lot of overlap in the benchmarking world, however for this distinction we’re separating into two segments mostly based on the utility of the resulting data. The benchmarks that fall under Science have a distinct use for the data they output – in our Simulation section, these act more like synthetics but at some level are still trying to simulate a given environment.

We are using DDR5 memory at the following settings:

  • DDR5-4800(B) CL40

Simulation

(3-1) DigiCortex 1.35 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

(3-2a) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 65x65, 250 Yr

(3-2b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr

(3-2c) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 257x257, 550 Yr

(3-3) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test

(3-4a) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Trains

(3-4b) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Belts

(3-4c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid

When it comes to simulation, the combination of high core frequency and better IPC performance gives Intel's 12th Gen Core series the advantage here in most situations.

Rendering

(4-1) Blender 2.83 Custom Render Test

(4-2) Corona 1.3 Benchmark

(4-3a) Crysis CPU Render at 320x200 Low

(4-3b) Crysis CPU Render at 1080p Low

(4-3c) Crysis CPU Render at 1080p Medium

(4-4) POV-Ray 3.7.1

(4-5) V-Ray Renderer

(4-6a) CineBench R20 Single Thread

(4-6b) CineBench R20 Multi-Thread

(4-7a) CineBench R23 Single Thread

(4-7b) CineBench R23 Multi-Thread

Looking at performance in the rendering section of our test suite, both the Core i7 and Core i5 performed creditably. The biggest factor to consider here is a higher core and thread count plus IPC performance will equal more rendering power.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Power, Office, And Science CPU Benchmark Performance: Encoding and Compression
Comments Locked

196 Comments

View All Comments

  • larry9 - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Note the difference : a closed platform design, an open cpu silicon design.
    You want to build a PC, you can't use an Apple chip. You want to run windows, you can't use an Apple chip. You want to add memory, a second drive, an input card?
    You are catching on.
  • Blastdoor - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Let me guess, due to the unfreezing process, you have no internal monologue?

    Anandtech has done some of the best reviews of Apple Silicon on the Internet, your internal monologue notwithstanding. I'm hoping to see a new one of the Mac Studio with its M1 Ultra. If there isn't going to be one, I'd just like to know so I can stop checking every day.
  • lmcd - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Andrei is gone, don't hold your breath. It's a skeleton crew at Anandtech now that leadership at Future has basically left the site to die.
  • Hifihedgehog - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Future is speedily becoming another TechTarget, acquiring and discarding sites after they serve their revenue-devouring purposes. I wager AnandTech forums will be closed down much like all the TechTarget forums (BrightHand, NotebookReview, TabletPCReview, etc.) now are.
  • Hifihedgehog - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Give it 5-7 years but the forums here will be closed as well. With Ian and Andrei gone, this site now has an expiration date.
  • Blastdoor - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    shoot -- I hadn't realized. What a shame :-(
  • Calin - Wednesday, March 30, 2022 - link

    There are applications that run on both platforms - some of them (like Cinebench) are even in this review.
    Also, there was a rough comparison between the Apple mobile phone core performance versus Intel server CPU core performance a couple of years ago.
    So, plenty of prior examples for an Apple vs Intel article, even if it's M1 versus Zen3 or whatever else.
  • Khanan - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Do you really need an review for that? If you want Apple you buy it, it’s good. If you don’t want Apple you won’t buy it anyway.
  • mode_13h - Wednesday, March 30, 2022 - link

    We want detailed benchmarks. We want to know how good the Ultra really is, particularly how well CPU and GPU performance scale up to dual-die. We want to see Apple's claims on performance and efficiency tested. I'm never going to buy a Mac, but I still want to know if their architecture lives up to their claims.

    Since Apple is leading on the innovation front, this could be taken as a harbinger of what's to come for other CPUs and GPUs.

    Detailed analysis of leading-edge tech is/was what this site is/was all about.
  • Khanan - Sunday, April 3, 2022 - link

    Did I talk to you? No. I realize you’re a huge nerd that has to comment on everything here. You don’t own this website and you should get a therapist for that, it’s a bit alarming what you do and not a good showing for this site.

    That said, I’m not gonna waste my time with you again. You should know why. Didn’t read your comment either.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now