System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to the manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our testbed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

The ASUS performs well in our power consumption tests and is marginally the most efficient of the ATX sized X570 models. It also stacks up well against the rest of the AM4 models on test.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

The ASUS is one of the fastest AM4 boards on test in our non-UEFI POST time testing, only fractionally slower than its B550-F Gaming. The X570-E Gaming turns the tables here slightly as it sits the best when all nonessential controllers are disabled.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

We test DPC latency at default settings out of the box, and ASUS is certainly doing something right, with some of the lowest DPC latencies we've seen on desktop motherboards.

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • vanish1 - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    Its the style that Asus uses now. My old P6X58D-E were different in their actuation and it wasnt even an afterthought releasing them
  • TrapStoner - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    Your old x58? Lmao this is not 2008 no more, every board nowadays uses the same style locks. I have this board too and i can say that yes they are a bit annoying, but my asrock z97 board was absolutely the same so you just get used to it.
  • vanish1 - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    yeah no shit its not 2008 anymore captain obvious, the point is if it aint broke dont fix it.
  • putins_pinky - Thursday, January 28, 2021 - link

    Looks like the heatsinks are in the way. My Prime X570-P has the same slot design and it's no problem.
  • docofkult - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    I assume that Asus did not name the board x570 and then go for the B550 chipset. Check the specs overview ;)
  • Slash3 - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    I liked the "thicker thins" on the VRM heatsink block.

    :P
  • Makaveli - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    "Some of its main features include Intel 2.5 GbE and Wi-Fi 6, with dual PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2, with plenty of USB 3.2 G2 connectivity."

    This board has Realtek 2.5 GbE not intel.
  • Jpeterson1 - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    It has both intel gigabyte, and realtek 2.5 gigabyte Ethernet. Just take a look at the back panel.
  • Makaveli - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    I can see that on the back panel. However what I quoted doesn't imply that.
  • MTEK - Monday, January 25, 2021 - link

    Nice board. I wanted to buy it in November along with an 5950X. However, the lack of availability and the China tariffs has been a mood killer. If the situation doesn't remedy itself by the end of Q2, I'll probably wait for this board's successor and Zen 4. Or rethink this expensive hobby.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now