Intel has already started to sell low-power dual-core Core i5/i7 Kaby Lake microprocessors for notebooks, but desktop parts with four cores and high frequencies are due in early 2017, as Intel announced back at IDF and the Kaby Lake-Y/U launch. In advance of the desktop launch, as is typical with how CPUs are launched, Intel has to send out qualification and near-retail samples to partners for pre-testing of release systems. Typically this is kept under wraps, without official public announcements (it's up to you how many of the leaks you want to believe), but late last week Intel sent out a 'Product Change Notification' through its online/public channels, with details about a good portion (no way to tell if it is all the SKUs) of Intel's Core i7 and Core i5-7000 series parts.

Within the PCN, Intel notified its customers about an additional assembly/packaging site for its desktop Kaby Lake-S chips in Vietnam and therefore had to disclose model numbers of the CPUs as well as some of the specifications. In addition, in a separate PCN detailing package adjustments for how chipset ICs are shipped, it would seem that Intel has also mentioned names of its upcoming 200-series chipsets.

According to Intel’s document for partners, the company intends to release at least 11 quad-core processors for desktops based on the Kaby Lake microarchitecture in Q1. What is noteworthy is that the company wants its customers to get ready to receive the first shipments of the KBL-S chips assembled in Vietnam starting from November 4, 2016, this week (which means that the final specs of the new processors have been set and will only be changed in extreme circumstances). The initial KBL-S lineup would seem to include three Core i7 SKUs, seven Core i5 CPUs as well as one Xeon E3 v6 product. (The fact that a Xeon v6 is included in this is interesting, given that Intel removed standard chipset support for Xeon E3 CPUs with Skylake and v5, meaning that both consumer and enterprise platforms are due to land in January.)

All the Kaby Lake-S processors will use the B0 stepping of the core, and will have 100-300 MHz higher base frequency compared to their Skylake-S counterparts. The PCN does not explicitly state the TDP, however we do not expect much to change given the slightly improved 14+ nm technology and the increased frequencies (same thing applies to cache size, which has been consistent for several generations). We have already observed that mobile Kaby Lake CPUs have higher clock rates compared to their predecessors due to enhancements of Intel’s 14+ nm process technology, and we see that their desktop brethren also have improvements on this front. We do not have the final Turbo frequencies at hand, but we expect them to be considerably higher than the base clock rates.

Basic Specifications of Quad-Core Intel Core i5/i5 and Xeon E3
Kaby Lake-S Skylake-S
Model Cores
/Threads
Freq.
(Base)
TDP Product
Code
S-Spec Model Freq.
(Base)
i7-7700K 4/8 4.2 GHz 95W CM8067702868535 SR33A i7-6700K 4.0GHz
i7-7700 3.6 GHz 65W CM8067702868314 SR338 i7-6700 3.4GHz
i7-7700T 2.9 GHz 35W CM8067702868416 SR339 i7-6700T 2.8GHz
i5-7600K 4/4 3.8 GHz 95W CM8067702868219 SR32V i5-6600K 3.5GHz
i5-7600 3.5 GHz 65W CM8067702868011 SR334 i5-6600 3.3GHz
i5-7600T 2.8 GHz 35W CM8067702868117 SR336 i5-6600T 2.7GHz
i5-7500 3.4 GHz 65W CM8067702868012 SR335 i5-6500 3.2GHz
i5-7500T 2.7 GHz 35W CM8067702868115 SR337 i5-6500T 2.5GHz
i5-7400 3.0 GHz 65W CM8067702867050 SR32W i5-6400 2.7GHz
i5-7400T 2.4 GHz 35W CM8067702867915 SR332 i5-6400T 2.2GHz
E3-1205v6 ?/? 3.0 GHz ? CM8067702871025 SR32D - -
Additional Info from Other Sources
i3-7300* 2/4 4.0 GHz 65W ? SR2MC i3-6300 3.8 GHz
Pentium G4620* 2/2 3.8 GHz 51W ? SR2HN Pentium G4520 3.6 GHz
Pentium G3950* 2/2 3.0 GHz 51W ? SR2MU Pentium G3920 2.9 GHz

*CPU details taken from this piece at PCOnline

Aside from the 14+ process offering higher frequencies, the base microarchitecture of Kaby Lake-S, as explained at the release of Kaby Lake-Y/U in September, is essentially the same as Skylake. However, on top of increasing the frequencies, Intel is also adding in Speed Shift v2 which allows for much quicker adjustments in CPU frequency over Skylake (down to 10ms rather than 30ms).

It remains to be seen is whether the new 14+ process technology will also enable considerably higher overclocking potential compared to existing CPUs. If it does, then the new chips have a chance to become rather popular among enthusiasts, potentially toppling the i7-2600K as a long term favorite.

It might be noted is that Intel’s Kaby Lake-S will have to compete not only against their predecessors, but also against AMD’s Zen products due in Q1. That being said, some would argue that given AMD's recent presentation of certain benchmark metrics, Zen is geared more towards the high-end desktop crowd. Nevertheless, it looks like early 2017 is going to be an interesting time for microprocessors.

200-Series Chipsets

In addition to model numbers of its Kaby Lake CPUs, Intel also revealed the names of its 200-series chipsets in another document it sent to partners. As expected, the lineup will include the Z270 PCH for enthusiast-class PCs with overclocking capabilities; Q270, H270 and H250 for mainstream systems and B250 for office/business computers. 

Intel 200-Series Chipsets
Name Socket Stepping Product Code S-Spec
Intel H270 LGA1151 A0 GL82H270 SR2WA
Intel Z270 GL82Z270 SR2WB
Intel B250 GL82B250 SR2WC
Intel Q250 GL82Q250 SR2WD
Intel Q270 GL82Q270 SR2WE
 
Intel C422 LGA1151? A0 GL82C422 SR2WG
Intel X299 ?!? A0 GL82X299 SR2Z2

Also in the list of chipsets were a couple of unknowns as well.

Listed in the PCN is C422, which because it has a 'C' in the name means that this is typically geared towards workstations and Xeon platforms. This may be in line with the E3-1205 v6 CPU SKU as seen in the processor list.

Also is X299, which really throws up a few question marks. The X-series chipsets are typically for Intel's High-End Desktop Platform (HEDT), and we've had X58, X79 and X99 in the last decade, from Nehalem up to Broadwell-E which was released back in May. This means either one of two things - either Intel is bringing the X nomenclature to Kaby Lake, the mainstream platform, or this is the next chipset for HEDT and the future Skylake-E series of processors. The first option in making X299 a Kaby Lake-related platform seems a little odd. However the second one, with Skylake-E, makes sense. After X99, the X119 name doesn't have the same marketability (if Intel was to keep parity with number jumps), but by pushing Skylake-E onto the 200-series naming as X299, it moves both mainstream and HEDT chipset naming strategies onto the same track. Note that we don't have a time-frame for Skylake-E as of yet.

Intel’s motherboard customers, given the Q1 launch, must be ready to receive the 200-series PCH ICs on new reels. According to the PCN, these will come with additional protections bands starting from December 2, 2016. Intel may or may not announce the whole 200-series (not X) lineup at CES, given this late in the day adjustment to core components for the motherboards. 

As for improvements of the Intel 200-series chipsets, we are still waiting on official confirmation as to exactly what to expect. Various unconfirmed leaks have indicated additional PCIe 3.0 chipset lanes, some new platform features and support for Intel’s Optane SSDs, however we will be here for the official launch when the time comes. It might be worth noting that almost all the motherboard manufacturers have now formally announced new 100-series BIOS support for Kaby Lake CPUs, meaning not all enthusiasts will have to get new motherboards.

Sources: Intel, PCOnline

POST A COMMENT

72 Comments

View All Comments

  • damianrobertjones - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    "3-7300. Dual core with HT, and 4.0ghz base"

    I also read that and thought, "Does anyone need anything else?" It's simply fantastic that an 'i3' reaches 4.0Ghz base.
    Reply
  • JoeyJoJo123 - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    These days all the dual cores have a very high base clock.

    Lots of idiot readers like to knock mobile-class dual-core HT i7's as not being "i7" worthy, but given that typical users do nothing more intensive than watch YouTube videos and make awfully egotistical posts on Tumblr and Facebook, then yeah, a dual-core with HT and that much higher base clock and lower TDP than a lower clocked quad core is actually a good match for the workload on that system.

    Consider that a relatively meager percentage of PC sales are actually used for somewhat intensive applications (such as games), and that most are used for mundane tasks, so yes, even in 2016 a dual-core is actually fine for most users.
    Reply
  • jaydee - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    The issue with the 15W i7, dual-core/HT is, there's no appreciable difference between the i5 and i7. The difference between i5-6300U and i7-6500U is 100MHz and 1 MB of cache. They are both dual-core, they both have HT, yet there's a 40% (tray price) premium on the i7 ($393 vs $281).

    I would think as a matter of branding, Intel would like to separate the i7 and i5 more than that. All this is, is marketing. Kinda like tuning a car to run 0-60 in 7.8 seconds instead of 8.0 seconds, calling is "sport edition" or "SS", mark it up a couple grand and then justify yourself by saying "well the way most people drive cars, it's a good match for the majority of drivers out there".
    Reply
  • HardwareDufus - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    No word on whether or not any of these will have the new Iris Pro+ HD620 IGP with Crystal Well GT3e eDRAM/L4. Ok. so obviously I have no idea what the latest and greates Intel IGP is really called, nor it's exact feature set, that's because nowhere have I seen mention of the terms HD 620 and GT3e together.

    So far all the specs I've seen call for an HD 620 GT2. Why not just put the best available as thermal is not an issue in a desktop? (and NO, I don't want to purchase a discrete video card).
    Reply
  • minijedimaster - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    You're an idiot Reply
  • HardwareDufus - Tuesday, November 1, 2016 - link

    Why thank you. And all along I was just striving for dufus. Reply
  • Flying Aardvark - Saturday, December 3, 2016 - link

    You're the idiot, minijedimaster. Not everyone uses and treats PCs as upgradable game consoles. People like you make me sick, and you should be shot in the head. If PC gaming ever dies, we'll still be here and you'll be jerking off in some corner like an idiot to some game.

    He just wants the best freebie IGP he can get with a fast CPU. I'm looking at the 7700K for the same reason.
    Reply
  • zodiacsoulmate - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    my 6700k can hit 4.4ghz at -55mv... is it even good my 3770k can get to 5.2ghz... Reply
  • Gothmoth - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    another lame update for the imbeciles who think they need the latest.

    intels baby steps when it comes to performance is really annoying.

    lets hope AMD´s ZEN can deliver and will not be another bulldozer crap.
    not that i will buy AMD but when it forces intel to really push it.... than i wish AMD all the best.
    Reply
  • JoeyJoJo123 - Monday, October 31, 2016 - link

    Gonna have to agree here. The baby steps forward and charging full price for essentially the same as last gen is pretty appalling, but that's what's allowed when there's little competition.

    Here's to AMD for bringing that competition back and putting Intel's feet over the fire.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now