AMD's Full Teaser Text

On June 01, 2016 at 10 a.m. China Standard Time (3 a.m. BST / 4 a.m. CEST) the Radeon Technologies Group will be announcing:

  • Radeon™ RX 480 set to drive premium VR experiences into the hands of millions of consumers; priced from just $199
  •  First Polaris architecture-based graphics processor to deliver VR capability common in $500 GPUs; expected to accelerate the size of the VR-ready install-base and dramatically increase the pace of VR ecosystem growth
  • RadeonTM RX 480 specifications including:
  AMD Radeon RX 480
TFLOPs (FMA) >5 TFLOPs
Compute Units 36
Memory Bandwidth 256GB/sec
Memory Clock 8Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 256-bit
VRAM 4GB/8GB
Typical Board Power 150W
VR Premium Yes
AMD FreeSync Yes
DisplayPort 1.3/1.4 HDR

Set to formally launch on June 29th, the Radeon™ RX 480 will deliver the world’s most affordable solution for premium PC VR experiences, including a model that is both HTC™ Vive Ready and Oculus™ Rift™ certified and delivering VR capability common in $500 GPUs.

In a notable market survey, price was a leading barrier to adoption of VR. The $199 SEP for select Radeon™ RX Series GPUs is an integral part of AMD’s strategy to dramatically accelerate VR adoption and unleash the VR software ecosystem. AMD expects that its aggressive pricing will jumpstart the growth of the addressable market for PC VR and accelerate the rate at which VR headsets drop in price:

  • More affordable VR-ready desktops and notebooks: AMD expects that affordable PC VR enabled by Polaris architecture-based graphics cards will drive a wide range of VR-ready desktops and notebooks, providing a catalyst for the expansion of the addressable market to an estimated 100 million consumers over the next 10 years.
  • Making VR accessible to consumers in retail: Thus far, retail has not been a viable channel for VR sales as average system costs exceeding $999 have precluded VR-ready PCs from seeing substantial shelf space. The Radeon™ RX Series graphics cards will enable OEMs to build ideally priced VR-ready desktops and notebooks well suited for the retail PC market.
  • Unleashing VR developers on a larger audience: Adoption of PC VR technologies by mainstream consumers is expected to spur further developer interest across the ecosystem, unleashing new VR applications in education, entertainment, and productivity as developers seek to capitalize on the growing popularity of the medium.
  • Reducing the cost of entry to VR: AMD expects that affordable PC VR enabled by Polaris architecture-based graphics cards will dramatically accelerate the pace of the VR ecosystem, driving greater consumer adoption, further developer interest, and increased production of HMDs, ultimately resulting in a lower cost of entry as prices throughout the VR ecosystem decrease over time.

The Radeon™ RX Series launch represents the first salvo in AMD’s new “Water Drop” strategy aimed at releasing new graphics architectures in high volume segments first to support continued market share growth for Radeon™ GPUs. In May 2016, Mercury Research reported that AMD gained 3.2% market share in discrete GPUs in Q1 2016. The Radeon™ RX Series will address a substantial opportunity in PC gaming: more than 13.8 million PC gamers who spend $100-300 to upgrade their graphics cards, and 84% of competitive and AAA PC gamers. With Polaris architecture-based Radeon™ RX Series graphics cards, AMD intends to redefine the gaming experience in its class, introducing dramatically improved performance and efficiency, support for compelling VR experiences, and incredible features never before possible at these prices.

Supporting Quotes:

“VR is the most eagerly anticipated development in immersive computing ever, and is the realization of AMD’s Cinema 2.0 vision that predicted the convergence of cinematic visuals and interactivity back in 2008,” said Raja Koduri, senior vice president and chief architect, Radeon Technologies Group, AMD. “As we look to fully connect and immerse humanity through VR, cost remains the daylight between VR being the purview of the wealthy, and universal access for everyone. The Radeon™ RX Series is the disruptive technology that adds rocket fuel to the VR inflection point, turning it into a technology with transformational relevance to consumers.”

“The Radeon™ RX series efficiency is driven by major architectural improvements and the industry’s first 14nm FinFET process technology for discrete GPUs, and could mark an important inflection point in the growth of virtual reality,” said Patrick Moorhead, principal analyst, Moor Insights & Strategy. “By lowering the cost of ownership and increasing the VR TAM, Radeon RX Series has the potential to propel VR-ready systems into retail in higher volumes, drive new levels of VR content investment, and even drive down the cost of VR headsets.”

“We congratulate AMD for bringing a premium VR ready GPU to market at a $199 price point,” said Dan O’Brien, vice president of virtual reality, HTC.  “This shows how partners like AMD survey the entire VR ecosystem to bring an innovative Radeon RX Series product to power high end VR systems like the HTC Vive, to the broadest range of consumers.”

AMD Teases Radeon RX 480
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • Meteor2 - Saturday, June 4, 2016 - link

    Compute.
  • Chaitanya - Friday, June 3, 2016 - link

    In that last photo in gallery there seems to be connector of some sort visible on pcb anyone has idea what that is for?
  • CountryBumkin - Friday, June 3, 2016 - link

    Is this card supporting HDCP 2.2?
    I know it supports HDMI 2.0a
    Thanks
  • JoeyJoJo123 - Friday, June 3, 2016 - link

    Most likely yes.

    Regardless, any HDCP stripper will make the HDCP version support stuff a moot point.
  • versesuvius - Friday, June 3, 2016 - link

    And with Polaris AMD has the narrowed the gap with NVidia from two years to one year, and with Zen the gap with Intel from 4 years to 3 years. That is progress and you can not knock it, but exactly how NVidia is going to react to this is already obvious. 1060 is going to be out around the middle of July with a TDP of 130 watts and a little better performance than 480X priced at $210. By the time Vega is out the door 1080Ti is already comfortably the fastest and highest performing GPU for the next year and a half. I was hoping against hope that AMD was going to actually announce Vega or at least give the specs for it but then again AMD lived up to its as of not so lately acquired reputation and just stayed behind both NVidia and Intel. Still, that is progress. Congratulations AMD. And congratulations to Intel and NVidia too. They won't have to worry about a visit by the antitrust commissioners for now.
  • medi03 - Saturday, June 4, 2016 - link

    Gap? What gap?
    Jesus, people.
    980T loses to Fury X at resolutions starting from 1440p.

    Comparing situation to CPU world, where Intel (STILL, even after bogus 14nm by Samsung) is years ahead process wise, is ridiculous.
  • Valantar - Saturday, June 4, 2016 - link

    Sorry, but you're a bit off here. Sure, AMD has been a bit behind Nvidia the last generation - they lost bad on the failed 20nm process, while Nvidia (with their far larger resources) were able to pivot better. Then again, they're already close to closing the efficiency gap - within one generation! - while still competing on both price and performance. Also, I believe Nvidia got very, very lucky with the way Pascal clocks on 16nm, giving them better performance than expected - otherwise, they wouldn't be making a second-tier (soon to be third when 1080Ti rolls out) GPU that beats their previous flagship. We don't know anything about the clocks of GCN 4 yet, but it's probably not that high. Still, AMD can gain a lot of performance just from driver improvements, which they have been delivering steadily on for the last year. And value like the RX 480 is exactly where they need to deliver to stay relevant. Sure, flagships are image building, but they don't keep your company afloat.

    Also, there is no way the GTX 1060 is at 130W - the 1070 is 150W with 1920 cores at >1,7GHz. If clocks are equal, that would give the GTX 1060 ~1650 cores at 130W, which would neither be smart (it would cannibalize 1070 sales like crazy), or possible (the GTX 1080 has 4 GPCs (2560 CUDA cores), the 1070 has 3 (1920 cores), which would then put the 1060 at ... 2,5? That makes no sense when the 1060 is supposed to be based on a separate, smaller chip. Thus, 1280 cores (2 GPCs) is far more likely, as Nvidia designing a whole new GPC for "small Pascal" would be ludicrously expensive and economically inefficient (not to mention the nightmare of yet another level of driver optimization). And 1280 cores wouldn't need 130W unless they ran them at 2+GHz - which would be dumb in terms of both cooling, stability and warranty/RMA costs.

    The GTX 1060 will in all likelyhood be around ~100W, and will probably perform similar to, if not slightly lower than, the RX 480. It will sell like hotcakes (it's going to be a midrange Nvidia GPU, after all), but AMD might have a winner here in terms of raw performance and price. We'll see.
  • Ananke - Monday, June 6, 2016 - link

    I highly doubt NVidia will sell the 1060 for less than $279, which of course will be non-existent until the $350 "founders" edition is sold out...
    My point, don't expect anything "gaming" usable from NV for less than $300 this round.
  • SeanJ76 - Sunday, June 5, 2016 - link

    More FAIL by AMD!!
  • cocochanel - Monday, June 6, 2016 - link

    What happens when one company brings a product that undercuts another company's profit margins ?
    The usual rant. And it usually comes from folks pretending to voice their own independent and unbiased opinion. In reality, and leaving the fanboys aside, these folks have a financial stake of some sort. And they don't like what they see.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now