Today we get an opportunity to look at two motherboards out of MSI's B360 stable in the form of the B360 Gaming Plus and B360 Gaming Arctic. The two boards look dramatically different – with one black and red and the other white – however, under the hood they share the same DNA. Both boards include a single PCIe x4 M.2 slot, five SATA ports, Crossfire support, Intel Ethernet, Realtek audio and more making for a well-rounded option in the non-overclocking B360 lineup. We'll take a look at the boards to see what makes them tick and run them through our performance tests.

MSI B360 Gaming Plus/Gaming Arctic Overview

The MSI B360 Gaming Plus and Gaming Arctic come from a family of 12 MSI B360 motherboards. The B360 chipset brings with it similar features from Z370, except they are not able to overclock. With this feature cast aside, it allows board partners to offer users the lion's share of features from Z370 in a less costly solution for the consumer. Since overclocking is not part of the equation, manufacturers only need to worry about running the processor at spec, as opposed to overbuilding for overclocking. In addition, more expansive audio codecs and other flexibility can be lost with moving a non-Z chipset. That said, B360 boards do offer users the vast majority of features and offer users boards that may include features that are not needed and driving up the cost unnecessarily.

The two boards we have here are perched up towards the top of the B360 lineup, offering users a well-rounded feature set as well as a pretty unique look, with the white Gaming Arctic being quite a standout. The Gaming Plus has the exact same style, with lines slashing through the bottom of the board into the chipset heatsink before angling up towards the rear IO. The obvious difference is black and red (Plus) versus white and grey (Arctic). Both boards hail from MSI's Performance Gaming series which MSI says is targeted for personalization. The Gaming series also includes their DDR4 Boost (isolation of memory circuitry), Steel Armor (PCIe slot), as well as integrated RGB LEDs controlled through Mystic Light software.

To start, we will say that performance between both of the boards was – for all intents and purposes – identical. We imagined this would be the case considering they are identical boards underneath and the results validated that thinking using the same turbo speeds throughout. Boot times were the shining star of these boards getting through POST the 2nd fastest of all Z370/B360 results. Other performance results were indistinguishable from other boards and find nothing anomalous and performing as expected.

Hardware wise, both boards have a single M.2 slot capable of supporting SATA and PCIe x4 NVMe based M.2 drives. Any additional will have to come through an add-in-card. SATA port count totals 5 with the first SATA port being disabled when using a SATA based M.2 module. The board has two full-length PCIe slots with the top slot reinforced with MSI's 'Steel Armor' and four x1 slots for use with other low bandwidth peripherals.

The rear IO panel tells a tale of a minimalist approach, but still has a broad range of connectivity. We are able to spy a legacy PS/2 port, two USB 2.0, two USB 3.0, and two USB 3.1 Type-A and Type-C) ports. For access to the iGPU MSI includes a DVI-D port as well as DisplayPort 1.2. Networking duty is handled by an Intel I219-V Gigabit device. MSI uses the Realtek ALC892 codecs on the boards forgoing the latest ALC1150 likely in an effort to save a couple of dollars.

Visual Inspection
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • boozed - Monday, August 27, 2018 - link

    I think you mean "fraternal", not "paternal".
  • dave_the_nerd - Monday, August 27, 2018 - link

  • boozed - Tuesday, August 28, 2018 - link

    I wish there was a "send corrections" button somewhere.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, August 27, 2018 - link

    Error on the CPU Performance, Short Form page:

    "The results with these three boards are notable quick than when using the non-updated OS and firmware on the motherboards."

    Should probably read "notably quicker" or something along those lines.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, August 27, 2018 - link

    Errors on the Conclusion page:

    "Most anything else will find its way onto a B360 board, and ultimately, often a good bit cheaper than its Z370 counterparts."

    Maybe something like "...and ultimately will often be a good bit..." so it flows a little better.

    "The VRM is admittedly not be the most robust we have seen, but it doesn't need to be considering the platform does not overclock."

    Should probably read "is admittedly not the most" which means omitting the awkwardly placed "be" from that line.
  • Ryan Smith - Monday, August 27, 2018 - link

  • justaviking - Monday, August 27, 2018 - link

    I find that white motherboard strangely attractive.
  • PeachNCream - Monday, August 27, 2018 - link

    I like it too. It's perhaps a bit over the top, but far less so than a lot of other boards out there. The lack of abstract dragons, birds, gears, or hints of cars and jets makes it very appealing. Though, if I were buying one, it'd still end up inside a windowless case, stuffed into a corner or a closet where it would stream games to a couch-friendly, fanless laptop or tablet.
  • Lord of the Bored - Wednesday, August 29, 2018 - link

    Call me crazy, but I'd like to see someone make a green motherboard.
  • EnzoFX - Thursday, August 30, 2018 - link

    I wanted a green board for my latest build... White looks slick sure, but needs matching gpu/ram, etc. Something.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now