Understanding Brightness in AMOLED and LCD Displaysby Joshua Ho & Brandon Chester on December 22, 2014 8:00 AM EST
While we generally avoid going into deep detail when it comes to our display testing, in light of statements that seemingly contradict our testing it becomes important to contextualize our display tests. Many people are often confused by contradicting statements regarding the peak brightness of an AMOLED display, as we will state that the Samsung Galaxy Note 4’s display reaches a maximum of 462 cd/m^2, while other sites often state that the Note 4’s display reaches a maximum of 750 cd/m^2. Another commonly cited discrepancy is that we rate the Nexus 6’s display to reach a peak brightness of 258 nits, while others have rated the Nexus 6’s display to be as bright as 400 nits.
One might immediately assume that one measurement is right, and the other is false. In truth, both measurements are achievable, as we’ll soon see. Before we get into any discussion of testing methodology though, we must first understand how AMOLED and LCD displays work. Fundamentally, LCD and OLED displays are almost completely different from one another, but face similar issues and limitations. LCD is the older of the two technologies, and is fundamentally quite simple, although not quite as simple as OLED. In short, we can view an LCD display as made of a backlight, and a color filtering array which has liquid crystals that control the passage of light, along with polarizers to make sure that the filtering system works correctly.
An Apple iPod Touch music player disassembled to show the array of white-edge LED's powered on with the device / ReTheCat
To break this system down further, we can look at the backlight. In the case of mobile devices, the only acceptable backlight system for thickness and power efficiency reasons is the edge-lit LED, which places a line of LEDs along an edge of the display, which is then diffused through a sheet of transparent material with strategically-placed bumps in the material to create points of light via total internal reflection. For the most part, LEDs in use today are blue LEDs with yellow phosphors in order to increase efficiency, although this means that the natural white point of such a backlight is higher than 6504k and requires filtering in order to reach a calibrated white point.
Schematic diagram IPS LC display / BBCLCD
While the backlight is relatively simple, the actual color filtering is a bit more complicated, although we will avoid extensive depth in this case. In the case of IPS, the structure is generally quite simple in nature, with two electrodes in plane with each other, which is used to generate an electric field that rotates the orientation of the liquid crystals in plane with the display to dynamically alter the polarization of the light that can pass through the liquid crystal array. With a set of fixed polarizers before and after the liquid crystal array, by using the controlling TFTs to alter the voltage applied on the electrodes one can adjust individual color output on a per-pixel basis.
Schematic of a bilayer OLED: 1. Cathode (−), 2. Emissive Layer, 3. Emission of radiation, 4. Conductive Layer, 5. Anode (+) /
AMOLED is a fundamentally different approach to the problem, which uses organic emitters deposited upon a substrate. These emitters are designed to emit red, green, or blue when voltage is applied across two electrodes. Similarly, TFTs are needed to control each pixel. As one can see, AMOLED is a simpler solution, but in practice the issues with such an implementation can be quite complex.
In order to determine what picture content to use for a measurement of maximum brightness, we must turn to a measurement known as Average Picture Level (APL). This is best explained as the percentage of the display that is lit up compared to a full white display, so a display that is completely red, green, or blue would be 33% APL.
As one might already be able to guess, with AMOLED power consumption is highly dependent upon the content displayed. With a pure white image, every pixel must be lit, while with a pure black image every pixel is off. As the display typically has a maximum power use set for a mobile device, this opens up the capability for AMOLED displays to allocate more power per pixel (i.e. higher maximum luminance) when not displaying a full-white image. This is in contrast with the edge-lit LCDs used in mobile displays, which have relatively limited local-dimming capabilities. As a result, the maximum brightness of an LCD is relatively fixed, regardless of the displayed content.
In the case of the Nexus 6, we can clearly see dimishing returns after 40% APL as there is efficiency droop on AMOLED displays that are similar in nature to LED backlights. While now it’s easy to understand why it is that AMOLED can vary in maximum brightness, the question is which brightness is “correct”. While an AMOLED display can technically have a maximum brightness of 750 nits, it’s unlikely that people will look at images effectively equivalent to 1% of the display lit up with white.
In practice, it turns out that with Lollipop and almost all web pages, the average picture level is quite high. It’s increasingly rare to see cases where displayed content is below 50% APL. According to Motorola, 80% APL represents an average APL for light UIs and in light of this, it seems appropriate to test at similarly real-world APLs. Taking a look at some commonly used applications in Lollipop, we see that the APL is regularly at or above even Motorola's 80% figure. I opened some of the applications on my Nexus 6's homescreen to take screenshots of whatever they had open when they came up, and I've tabulated the results below.
|APL in %|
|Reddit Is Fun (Light)||77|
|Reddit Is Fun (Dark)||23|
|Chrome New Tab||86|
As you can see, many of the screens in Android's interface as well as web pages and third party apps have a high APL. There are exceptions, like the Calculator application and any application with a dark theme, but the overall trend is clear. Google's new interface style also means that applications are more likely to adopt interfaces with large amounts of white than in the past.
As a result of this, we test at 100% APL in order to get an idea of perceived brightness. While there may be some need for lower APL testing, it’s important to also consider cases such as OLED aging which will lower peak brightness over time. It's also important to consider that the delta between 80% APL and 100% APL in this case is around 44 nits. This makes for about an 18% delta in brightness, which ends up being around the noticeable difference in most cases. While our testing is subject to change, in the case of brightness we currently do not see much need to dramatically alter our methodology.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
blzd - Tuesday, December 23, 2014 - linkWoah what was that, the 3rd comment on the article? Calm down and get back to work at the OLED consortium lol.
Maybe if you guys can solve those burn in issues and blue longevity, Apple might actually consider using an OLED panel in one of their devices.
krumme - Wednesday, December 24, 2014 - linkAn old galaxy s4 screen still beats the crap out of a brand new ips screen. If people actually used their eyes its very simple.
An example. Using an s4+ qulity oled screen its obvious to tell the dynamic difference of camera sensors from apc to fullframe. The same goes for eg the punchy colors of good zeis lenses vs cheap stuff.
A good oled shows the dynamics and punch of the real world.
Samsung have chosen crappy standard settings but choose a more realistic setting (for bright sourroundings thats standard or else movie) and you get a lifelike picure even the best ips can get close. Its not even close. In my eyes its like the difference between a mechanical hd and a ssd.
krumme - Wednesday, December 24, 2014 - linkSince using pentile the issue of longevity is a non issue for new oled.
There is no perspective in lcd. It has always given a bad picture. Ips made things kind of acceptable but even old crt still have advantages to ips.
One of the things oled lacks big time in my eyes is shadow detail. That is worth improving.
Since s4 eg whitebalance have been accetable and with note 3 brightness was not a practical issue any more. It does not make any sence to focus more on it. Now its about battery life, shadow detail and especially get cost down.
tygrus - Friday, December 26, 2014 - linkSo, are you saying that while a small area can be very bright they don't let it for very long nor the whole screen go very bright at the same time to reduce heat and save power ??
dawheat - Tuesday, December 30, 2014 - linkWould have been better to see the numbers based on the newest AMOLED tech, specifically the Note 4, and not the Nexus 6 which seems to be using last gen tech. The rate of progress in AMOLEDs makes this doubly important.
The Nexus 6 seems to be closer to the Note 3 (which was the first good enough AMOLED) and not the Note 4, which is the first AMOLED I feel gives up nothing to the best LCDs in all use cases - even bright sunlight.