Gigabyte H77N-WiFi Review – First Look at Ivy Bridge with mITXby Ian Cutress on November 6, 2012 12:00 PM EST
- Posted in
Reviews of the Ivy Bridge platform at AnandTech have focused solely on the primary chipset supplied to most desktop users – Z77. In a twist, today we are reviewing both the H77 platform, but also a mITX product in the form of the Gigabyte H77N-WiFi. Gigabyte has released two mITX motherboards for use with Ivy Bridge processors – both the H77 and Z77 variants, and they see the H77 as the one to focus on. This makes sense as mITX builds are not often overclocked, and are limited to a single PCIe slot, making two of the main benefits of Z77 void and pointing to H77 as the answer.
In a twist to previous 7-series reviews, we are going to focus our attention with mITX boards towards the i3-3225 processor. This is a dual core Ivy Bridge processor with both HyperThreading and Intel’s HD 4000 (the high end) integrated graphics, all within a 65W rated envelope. The direct competition to this lies at the hands of the Trinity A10-5800K, which we have reviewed in terms of pure performance and from a chipset point of view.
Gigabyte H77N-WiFi Overview
Measuring only 17cm x 17cm (6.7” x 6.7”), a mini-ITX motherboard has to work with very little PCB real estate. On high end motherboards, we often see that the addition of extra controllers and buttons can take up a lot of room – thus for a mITX product, we have to strip away all the excess, see what we are left with, and then add in features as appropriate.
For the large part, or H77 platform acts similar to the Z77. Our main differences with H77 are the lack of overclocking, the restriction of memory straps to DDR3-1600, and PCIe devices from the CPU are limited to a single x16 slot. Thus on a large mATX or ATX H77 product, extra slots for PCIe devices will most likely be taken up by x1 or x4 slots linked to the chipset, or PCI slots by PCIe-to-PCI conversion. H77 still gives us access to four USB 3.0 ports, two SATA 6 Gbps, four SATA 3 Gbps and video outputs.
From the perspective of small form factor systems the usual suspects for a product like this are in small 24/7 builds, HTPC, or a mobile gaming machine that can be easily carried. From the point of view of Gigabyte, this means that a H77 product makes sense, but a Z77 product should be available to users if so desired for overclocking. It should be noted that the H77 products should be able to be underclocked if required, though not always undervolted.
On the whole, the Gigabyte GA-H77N-WiFi is a nice build, although it contains a mixture of good and bad design choices. Due to the use of H77, there is no need for any substantial power management, so none is given – the board still uses Ultra Durable 4, but we have a 3+1 system with no heatsink. The main critical point with this board though (as will be the main critical point of many mITX builds) is the placement of the processor in relation to the memory and PCIe slot.
The socket area is up against the memory and the PCIe slot, meaning that users have a limited range of coolers to use. As shown later in the review, large coolers will have to be oriented correctly, with different memory choices, or disregarded altogether. If the cooler is large, then there is also intrusion onto the PCIe slot if the GPU has a rear back plate. This is not ideal. There are mITX boards were the socket is in a more amenable orientation, but yet it is placed in such a location that only stock coolers or all-in-one liquid cooling systems are to be suggested. With the popularity of ‘tall’ mITX cases such as the Bitfenix Prodigy, large coolers may have to find their way onto these smaller systems in due course. Maybe I am just being picky – this H77 board is not designed for overclocking, and thus big coolers are not necessarily needed.
After some intense discussion with Gigabyte regarding this product, it comes to light that the H77 and Z77 mITX boards that are on sale to consumers are actually models designed for a specific customer in Asia. Gigabyte do this on a regular basis – if a particular business customer (e.g. a distributor, system builder) wants a specific design and is willing to place a large order, then Gigabyte will go that mile to make the product. Sometimes these products are then also marketed to home users, such as the H77 and Z77 mITX.
This is in important point, given that we have baffling placement locations on the H77N-WiFi. We have SATA ports at the top end of the motherboard, along with the front panel header and a USB 3.0 header right up against the IO panel. The 4-pin CPU power connector is located so far into the board that it raises concern about how Gigabyte would assume that the board would be placed in a case with respect to the front panel and power supply.
The board offers several plus points, especially with the fact that the board is kitting out with dual HDMI ports. This allows for the division of labor between video output on one and audio output on the other (for home audio systems), or both outputs on both for multi-monitor setups. (Contrary to what was my belief, the Z77 / Ivy Bridge specifications do not dictate which digital outputs need to be present, only that there are three to use – meaning that on full size Z77 ATX boards, manufacturers could use dual HDMI ports there instead of DVI-D.) There are also dual Realtek network ports for home server/SOHO setups, alongside an Intel WiFi module capable of connecting to WiDi displays for cable-less management.
Performance wise, our only comparison point lies with an equivalent Trinity based platform. In this circumstance, the i3-3225 trades blows with the A10-5800K, but both sides put up crushing blows against the other. On the Intel side, we have superior single threaded performance, especially in FP benchmarks where the difference can be 43% higher on the Intel. This also brings the results using a discrete graphics card in favor for the Intel. In comparison, the Trinity platform goes toe-to-toe with Intel on multithreaded INT benchmarks, and scores a win when comparing IGP performance.
Even though this product initially being produced for a sole customer with specific needs, it does offer a price-competitive take on the mITX 7-series design.
As the H77N-WiFi is a mini-ITX board, we have the standard mITX dimensions with the PCB – 17cm x 17cm. In total the motherboard offers two full length DDR3 DIMM slots, a total of four SATA ports, two fan headers, one USB 3.0 header, one USB 2.0 header, dual Ethernet ports, an integrated Intel WiFi module with WiDi support, dual HDMI input with DVI-I and a single PCIe 3.0 x16 slot.
The socket area is, for lack of a better word, confusingly placed. We find it on the bottom right of the image above, and looking closer at the picture we see the four socket holes are enclosed in a white square on the PCB. This is the Intel minimum specification for the 1155 socket platform – all items in this space has a maximum z-dimension in order to allow the Intel air cooler to function appropriately. Motherboard manufacturers all adhere to this and anything extra beyond this space is at the discretion of the manufacturer. Typically on larger boards manufacturers will give more space, as users may want to large air coolers in order to improve overclocking or thermal performance within the case. Admittedly on a mITX board there is not much extra room to give, but Gigabyte have placed two of the edges up against two main components of the system – the memory and the PCIe slot. The motherboard is marketed as an all-round performer, meaning in some builds (especially with cases like the Bitfenix Prodigy) users will put in a large GPU combined with tall memory. It has been reported that the close proximity of the socket area to the GPU will cause problems with GPUs that have large backplates, and essentially Gigabyte have limited users to the stock air cooler or similar designs that do not breach the x-y component of the socket area, such as all-in-one liquid coolers.
I should stress that this is a common problem on *most* H77/Z77 mITX boards, and not just on this one. The alternative would be to arrange the socket and chipset layout as with normal ATX boards – with the socket at the top and the chipset/SATA ports at the bottom. I would have suggested a couple of extra design features in order to ease the burden. The WiFi module could be moved to the underside of the board, or replacing the memory slots with SO-DIMM modules. Even the SO-DIMM could be moved to the underside and slanted, similar to laptops and notebooks. This would leave more space on top to play with SATA ports to give the full complement, headers or the like. One of the downsides from a construction point of view may be complexity, or having to add more PCB layers, which in turn adds cost.
Aside from the socket area, I should point out the fan headers. With the Gigabyte H77N-WiFi, we have two – both to the left of the socket, both 4-pin. One is next to the onboard audio header, and the other is next to the 4-pin CPU power connector. The location of this 4-pin CPU power connector is a little odd. While I accept that it must be near the CPU itself, being in the middle of the board means that a PSU cable has to stretch over a good number of components. This restricts airflow and reduces aesthetic appeal (if desired). If the CPU and the chipset were swapped around, this would be less of an issue perhaps.
Along the top of the board we have our SATA ports. The H77 chipset offers the same amount as the Z77, this being two SATA 6 Gbps and four SATA 3 Gbps. Nevertheless, due to real estate concerns, we lose two of the SATA 3 Gbps ports on the Gigabyte H77N-WiFi. To the left of these is the solitary USB 3.0 port, powered by the chipset. The chipset itself is hidden behind a small heatsink. Moving right we have the front panel header and a USB 2.0 header. The Intel WiFi module is located flat against the motherboard, with the two cables connecting the module to the antenna snaking under the chipset heatsink. Besides the 24-pin ATX connector we have the motherboard battery. This is flat against the PCB like in ATX models, rather than upright which is what we normally see on PCB limited designs.
The rear panel on the Gigabyte H77N-WiFi is one thing done right. From left to right we have a combination PS/2 port, two USB 3.0 in blue (chipset), dual HDMI, two antenna ports, DVI-I, two gigabit Ethernet ports (Realtek), four USB 2.0 ports, optical S/PDIF output and audio jacks (Realtek ALC892). It should be noted that Gigabyte use their one-fuse-per-USB port system, meaning that should one USB port fail then the rest of the USB in the block are not affected.
Two DDR3 DIMM slots supporting up to 32 GB
Up to Dual Channel, 1066-1600 MHz
2 x HDMI, up to 1920x1200
DVI-I, up to 1920x1080
2 x Realtek 8111E
1 x Intel WiFi Module
|Onboard Audio||Realtek ALC892|
|Expansion Slots||1 x PCIe 3.0 x16|
2 x SATA 6 Gbps, Support for RAID 0, 1, 5, 10
2 x SATA 3 Gbps, Support for RAID 0, 1, 5, 10
4 x USB 3.0 (Chipset) [2 back panel, 2 onboard]
6 x USB 2.0 (Chipset) [4 back panel, 2 onboard]
2 x SATA 6 Gbps
2 x SATA 3 Gbps
1 x USB 3.0 Header
1 x USB 2.0 Header
1 x COM Port Header
2 x Fan Headers
1 x Onboard Audio Header
1 x 24-pin ATX Power Connector
1 x 4-pin CPU Power Connector
1 x CPU (4-pin)
1 x SYS (4-pin)
1 x PS/2 Combination Port
2 x USB 3.0 (Blue)
2 x HDMI
1 x DVI-I
2 x Antenna Port
2 x Realtek 8111E GbE
4 x USB 2.0 (Black)
1 x S/PDIF Optical Output
|Warranty Period||3 Years|
Asides from the layout choices which could be questionable, we could also argue if there is additional merit of including two Ethernet ports as well an Intel WiFi module. A lot depends on the layout of your system – home network and NAS via Ethernet, but also connected to the home network via WiFi is one orientation.
As I have explained, the Gigabyte H77N-WiFi is price competitive compared to Z77 ATX boards. Part of this comes down to using Realtek network controllers rather than Intel (even if we do have an Intel WiFi module), and the less than optimal ALC892 codec. If this does not bother the user, then as long as putting the system goes well, then the Gigabyte can offer a nice ‘bang-for-buck’ product.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Geraldo8022 - Wednesday, November 7, 2012 - linkI like the placement of the 24 pin power header. My E350 case has the external power button right where it interferes with the power header toward inside of front panel. Also I like testing with i3. I go for lowest power consumption. I use a picoPSU and would like to see these tested with that psu. For me it is a USB world. all I care about is HDTV, low power and USB3. If you want to overclock perhaps you should go with a bigger board.
Pcosx - Wednesday, November 7, 2012 - linkWhy don't anybody makes a z77/h77 board with dual link dvi output? Is it so much more to make one?
Dug - Friday, November 9, 2012 - linkGood question, and it would be nice to know the limitations of video output on these motherboards with different connections.
Znarkus - Thursday, November 8, 2012 - linkWhy present POST time with two decimal points, if there is a 1 second error margin?
IanCutress - Friday, December 7, 2012 - linkResults from my stop watch. Error margin is a large overestimate of what it might be from human error, not hardware error. For each reading I take 3 measurements, and more often than not I get all three in the same 0.10 seconds.
lwatcdr - Thursday, November 8, 2012 - linkI would love to know how well this is supported under Linux? No real need for Benchmarks just put Ubuntu, Mint, or Fedora on it and see if the Network, WiFi, Video, Sata, and USB all work.
Also Hackintosh compatibility would be nice but maybe too out their to be worth your time but would be very cool.
mrgreenfur - Friday, November 9, 2012 - linkThe spec table shows z77 chipset, should be h77?
dingetje - Wednesday, November 21, 2012 - linkplease include the EVGA Z77 Stinger Mini-ITX Motherboard in the upcoming article.
lemmo - Tuesday, February 26, 2013 - linkThanks for the detailed review. Could you give an idea of what the audio benchmark actually means? Do those results indicate that the audio quality is good or bad?
A review of the Gigabyte B75 ITX board shows that the audio quality is poor, and the Gigabyte Z77 board not much better. They also use Rightmark Audio Analyser, but represent the results differently so there is no way to compare. Please can you give your audio test results in dB(A) so we can compare?
It would also be good to have a wider comparison of the power draw, say with the Z77 ITX boards you reviewed.
raavan19raavan - Monday, April 15, 2013 - linkhave problems with the graphics card!! Works fine with the graphics BIOS settings at auto but does not work with BIOS settings with graphics set to PEG and changed the miscellaneous settings from Auto to Gen1,Gen3 but still didnt work. Tested it on different systems and it seems to work fine but does not work only on this mobo, the mobo itself is fine again. The graphics card is a HD6670 1GB DDR5.