MacBook Pro 2011 Refresh: Specs and Detailsby Andrew Cunningham on February 24, 2011 4:40 PM EST
As expected, Apple today unveiled a range of speed and functionality improvements for its MacBook Pro lineup. The update was unusually quiet for Apple. There was no scheduled press event and nothing more than a press release announcing the specs and availability. Apple retail stores received stock prior to today and began selling product immediately. The Apple online store also has immediate availability.
No mere speed bump, these new MacBooks bring Intel’s new Sandy Bridge processors chipsets to the entire line, replacing the previous Arrandale processors and finally retiring the aging Core 2 Duo from service in the 13-inch model.
Contrary to earlier reports, there are no default SSD configurations although the solid state offerings are still optional. The big new feature (outside of Sandy Bridge) is support for the first incarnation of Intel’s Light Peak interface technology, now called Thunderbolt.
|2011 MacBook Pro Lineup|
|13-inch (low end)||13-inch (high end)||15-inch (low end)||15-inch (high end)||17-inch|
|Dimensions||0.95 H x 12.78 W x 8.94 D||0.95 H x 12.78 W x 8.94 D||0.95 H x 14.35 W x 9.82 D||0.95 H x 14.35 W x 9.82 D||0.98 H x 15.47 W x 10.51 D|
|Weight||4.5 lbs (2.04 kg)||4.5 lbs (2.04 kg)||5.6 lbs (2.54 kg)||5.6 lbs (2.54 kg)||6.6 lbs (2.99 kg)|
|CPU||2.3 GHz dual-core Core i5||2.7 GHz dual-core Core i7||2.0 GHz quad-core Core i7||2.2 GHz quad-core Core i7||2.2 GHz quad-core Core i7|
|GPU||Intel HD 3000 Graphics||Intel HD 3000 Graphics||Intel HD 3000 + AMD Radeon HD 6490M (256MB)||Intel HD 3000 + AMD Radeon HD 6750M (1GB)||Intel HD 3000 + AMD Radeon HD 6750M (1GB)|
|RAM||4GB 1333MHz DDR3 (8GB max)||4GB 1333MHz DDR3 (8GB max)||4GB 1333MHz DDR3 (8GB max)||4GB 1333MHz DDR3 (8GB max)||4GB 1333MHz DDR3 (8GB max)|
|HDD||320GB 5400 RPM||500GB 5400 RPM||500GB 5400 RPM||750GB 5400 RPM||750GB 5400 RPM|
|Display Resolution||1280x800||1280x800||1440x900 (1680x1050 optional)||1440x900 (1680x1050 optional)||1920x1200|
|Ports||Gigabit LAN, Firewire 800, Thunderbolt, 2x USB 2.0, SDHC slot, combined audio in/out jack||Gigabit LAN, Firewire 800, Thunderbolt, 2x USB 2.0, SDHC slot, combined audio in/out jack||Gigabit LAN, Firewire 800, Thunderbolt, 2x USB 2.0, SDHC slot, separate audio in/out jacks||Gigabit LAN, Firewire 800, Thunderbolt, 2x USB 2.0, SDHC slot, separate audio in/out jacks||Gigabit LAN, Firewire 800, Thunderbolt, 3x USB 2.0, separate audio in/out jacks, ExpressCard 34 slot|
When Apple moved its MacBook Pro lineup to Arrandale, the poor 13-inch model lost out - it remained with an older Core 2 Duo CPU. The move to Sandy Bridge is different - all models got an upgrade.
Sandy Bridge is used across the board and interestingly enough only the 13-inch model uses a dual-core CPU. Both the 15-inch and 17-inch MacBook Pros now feature quad-core CPUs. This makes these two MacBook Pros ripe for a desktop replacement usage model, particularly if paired with an SSD.
Sandy Bridge obviously integrates Intel’s HD 3000 graphics on die, which is used by all of the new MBPs by default. The 15-inch model and 17-inch model add switchable dedicated graphics from AMD, ousting the NVIDIA chips that powered the previous lineup. I wouldn’t read too much into this – Apple is always going back and forth between NVIDIA and AMD graphics, usually based on whoever happens to be offering the best or most efficient chip at the time of refresh.
Per usual, this refresh sees Apple offering customers more computer for the same money, rather than giving out any substantial price cuts. This is nothing specific to Apple but rather a benefit of buying in an industry driven by Moore's Law.
One number on this spec sheet sticks out like a sore thumb from the rest, and that is Apple's decision to offer 5400RPM SATA hard drives as the default storage option across the line. The price differential between 5400 RPM drives and 7200 RPM drives is negligible these days, and for these prices, the company could certainly afford to address this performance bottleneck. I would hope that Apple would at least consider Seagate’s hybrid drive as an alternative until we get Intel enabled SSD caching.
Upgrades to 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB solid state drives available but predictably costly ($250, $650, and a whopping $1,250, respectively). It is worth noting that at $250 for a 128GB SSD, Apple’s upgrade pricing isn’t too far off what the market value is for the lowest end SSD. The 256GB pricing is a bit insane.
Apple has finally standardized on 4GB of memory across the board, although I would’ve liked to have seen 8GB offered on the higher end configurations.
Also new is what Apple calls a "FaceTime HD camera," which looks to be a high definition version of Apple's standard webcam - not much more that's noteworthy about this, except that the iSight moniker is continuing its slow disappearance from Apple's spec sheet one model at a time.
It is disappointing that Apple makes no mention of QuickSync in its announcement. The hardware video transcoding engine is a key part of Sandy Bridge, however it looks like OS X support for the technology may not be ready quite yet.
It’s worth noting that Apple’s new laptops were apparently not delayed much by the SATA bug discovered in the 6-series chipsets last month – this likely means that Apple is shipping the affected B2 stepping parts but only using the 6Gbps ports.
There’s no change in chassis size or weight with the new MacBook Pros, this is an internal upgrade. Well, mostly...
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
TareX - Thursday, February 24, 2011 - linkHow does the screen compare to the HP Envy 14's that came with a 900p Radiance display?
Exelius - Thursday, February 24, 2011 - linkApple's displays have always been best-in-class. My 15" MBP has a 1680x1050 display and the quality of the display is the best I've seen. The radiance displays HP used were generally considered to be on-par with Apple's displays. The high-quality display is a large part of why MBPs are so expensive.
seapeople - Thursday, February 24, 2011 - linkCorrection, the high-quality display is ~5% of why MBP's are so expensive.
It's not like the thing is IPS or something.
nikclev - Friday, February 25, 2011 - linkInteresting. I was under the impression that the display WAS in fact an IPS panel.
Either way, I'm not an apple hater, but for my uses they are too expensive.
Penti - Sunday, February 27, 2011 - linkWell displays are actually pretty pricey even if they are not IPS. The anti-glare high-res upgrade is $150 extra to boot. I would guess the screen is as much as one-twelfth to one-tenth. For a repair the high-res anti-glare would cost, the same panel that is, around 300 dollars for the part. You couldn't get an equivalent for less then 199 USD. On cheap laptops the screen is a quarter of the price.
Penti - Sunday, February 27, 2011 - linkOf course there is a problem that screens like the dreamcolor display (LG.PH from HP) uses 15W. However you can get that display for $150. Which HP charges $550 for to upgrade.
Penti - Sunday, February 27, 2011 - linkI.e. it's quite a different matter @ 17".
erple2 - Thursday, February 24, 2011 - linkTechnically, the displays have always been high quality, but not quite best in class. For the $2500 17" notebook variants, there is a Dell and HP that offers a better display ("Dreamcolor" from HP and the RGBLED display from DELL). Those are business oriented laptops, however.
Similar story for the 15" ones from Dell/HP. Those are, however, the top displays available in mobile form factors for somewhere within reason of the MBP offerings.
solofest - Thursday, February 24, 2011 - linkThe high-end 13" has an i7, not an i5.
RaLX - Thursday, February 24, 2011 - linkThe 13" and 15" base models upgrades are like giving one step ahead in CPU and one step back in GPU... It's not worthy at all upgrading if you already own a 2010 model.
These new models are probably cheaper to build for Apple and they sell it at the same price so the only real upgrade is the profits per unit for them...