Realtek may only be a household name for particularly nerdy families, but their chips are everywhere in the PC industry. They are best known for their near-ubiquitous audio codecs and for their networking chips. Their products are usually not known as the absolute best quality that money can buy, but they consistently offer "good enough" performance and feature sets combined with very affordable pricing that wins over OEMs and gets Realtek devices in the hands of any consumer that isn't deliberately avoiding them.

In recent years, Realtek has set their sights on the SSD market. Some of their earliest attempts to make SSD controllers were more or less failures (eg. a 55nm NVMe controller that could barely break 1GB/s), but they now have a full lineup of controllers are ready to compete in almost every market segment. This is where ADATA comes in; we can usually count on them to try out all the SSD controllers and NAND options available. They end up shipping more of those experiments than is really sensible, and that contributes to their confusingly broad product lineup. However, they are more judicious with their review sampling, which is why we're looking at Realtek's second-generation SSD controllers.

We're starting our look into ADATA's Realtek-based SSDs at the low end of the product stack, with the ADATA Ultimate SU750, a DRAMless SATA SSD using the RTS5733 controller and 3D TLC NAND. This drive is also being sold as the Amazon-exclusive ADATA SU760.

The RTS5733 controller is a mere two-channel design, which puts it in the same league as controllers like the Phison S11, used in a variety of budget SATA drives. Quite a few other budget drives use Silicon Motion 4-channel controllers like the SM2258XT, and they don't seem to have any trouble competing on cost with drives using smaller 2-channel controllers.

Part of Realtek's overall SSD controller strategy is an emphasis on reducing the need for external DRAM on the SSD; the performance penalties that come from having little or no DRAM are partially offset by including larger buffers on the controller itself, but the precise amount has not been disclosed.

ADATA Ultimate SU750 SSD Specifications
Capacity 256 GB 512 GB 1 TB
Form Factor 2.5" SATA
Controller Realtek RTS5733DMQ
NAND Flash Micron 64L 3D TLC
Sequential Read 550 MB/s
Sequential Write 520 MB/s
Random Read 65k IOPS
Random Write 75k IOPS
Warranty 3 years
Write Endurance 200 TB
0.7 DWPD
400 TB
0.7 DWPD
800 TB
0.7 DWPD
Current Retail Price $31.99

The ADATA SU750 uses Micron 64L 3D TLC NAND flash memory, the same as most of ADATA's current SSD models. ADATA does their own binning and packaging of NAND, and it appears that the SU750 gets pretty good quality flash: the write endurance ratings are roughly 0.7 drive writes per day for the 3-year warranty period, equivalent to about 0.4 DWPD over 5 years. This is slightly higher endurance than quite a few of ADATA's own SSDs that come with 5-year warranties. If anything, we usually expect DRAMless SSDs to get lower endurance ratings due to less effective wear leveling.

The use of a DRAMless, two-channel controller doesn't hurt the sequential IO specs for the SU750, but it does lead ADATA to give it lower random IO performance ratings than mainstream drives that can saturate the SATA link. The random read performance takes the bigger hit, which is normal for DRAMless drives.

The construction of the SU750 is typical for a low-end SATA drive. The case is half metal, half plastic, and held together with clips rather than screws. The PCB inside takes up only a third of the available space. The bulk of that PCB space is taken up by two NAND packages on each side, containing 256GB each for our 1TB sample. The two-channel DRAMless controller itself has a fairly low pin count and consequently small footprint.

The Competition

We don't get really low-end SSD samples very often, but we do have the Toshiba TR200 as a representative of the many drives that use the Phison S11 controller with Toshiba NAND. We also have the Samsung 860 QVO, a QLC-based SSD that belongs in this entry-level segment even if Samsung refuses to price it accordingly. Also of note is the ADATA SU800, an older model with Micron 32-layer 3D TLC that is slower and cheaper than current mainstream SATA drives, but usually outperforms any DRAMless SATA drive thanks to the SU800's DRAM buffer. (Note that the largest SU800 we have is the 512GB model, so it's at a potential disadvantage to the 1TB SU750.) The rest of the drives we are comparing the SU750 to are in higher tiers, though the price differences between mainstream SATA drives and an entry-level model like the SU750 can be all but erased by a good sale.

The Crucial BX500 and Mushkin Source are similar DRAMless SATA drives in direct competition with the SU750. We've tested a smaller capacity of the Source, but have not tested the BX500.

AnandTech 2018 Consumer SSD Testbed
CPU Intel Xeon E3 1240 v5
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty E3V5 Performance Gaming/OC
Chipset Intel C232
Memory 4x 8GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 CL15
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 5450, 1920x1200@60Hz
Software Windows 10 x64, version 1709
Linux kernel version 4.14, fio version 3.6
Spectre/Meltdown microcode and OS patches current as of May 2018
Cache Size Effects
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • brucethemoose - Friday, December 6, 2019 - link

    Depends how much you write. An HDD is great stone cold or hot bulk data, but I'd trust a big, cheapo SSD more for my "lukewarm" stuff, where I'm reading it every once in awhile, but not writing enough to wear the QLC out.
  • flyingpants265 - Friday, December 6, 2019 - link

    For stuff I actually don't want to lose, which is not that much (200gb or so), I have it on SSD, HDD, and another offline HDD which is unplugged.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Sunday, December 8, 2019 - link

    Your average SSD user will reach the TBW rating in 56 years of daily use. "lifespan" isnt an issue. If you ARE regularly writing terrabytes of data, the sheer speed difference of a SSD will save you truckloads of time/money.

    HDDs suck outside of niche massive file allocation.
  • FunBunny2 - Sunday, December 8, 2019 - link

    "HDDs suck outside of niche massive file allocation. "

    and data stability.
  • extide - Friday, December 6, 2019 - link

    Samsung 860 QVO 4TB
  • flyingpants265 - Friday, December 6, 2019 - link

    Not a bad idea, but I couldn't justify $300+ for a 4TB SSD.

    I think my ideal setup right now is still 1TB nvme+a few hard drives..
  • romrunning - Friday, December 6, 2019 - link

    The Crucial MX500 2TB goes for $206-220 on Amazon. It's also a decent performer.
  • PaulHoule - Friday, December 6, 2019 - link

    I get depressed reading reviews of DRAMless SSDs. It seems like some vendors won't stop until they make an SSD which performs worse than an HDD.

    In general I don't agree with the rankings that Anand and other review sites give for SSDs. I don't particularly care about median performance, but I do care about performance at the 90%, 99%, etc. level -- because that is what causes your computer to freeze up for 10 seconds here or there.

    Often reviewers pick out a drive that has good 50% performance, but for just a few dollars more you can get something with much better tail latency, for instance I have been happy with some Intel SSDs I've bought. If an "Intel Inside" sticker meant that a machine had an Intel SSD that would be impressive, but Intel has been damaging its brand with Atom, Celeron and things like that. They ought to take a cue from American car makers who regularly retire the names of the bad compact cars they make like Chevette, Gremlin, Neon, Cavalier, etc...
  • extide - Friday, December 6, 2019 - link

    Yeah, I think Allyn at PCPer did the best SSD reviews tbh. He captures all of that 'last percent drop off' stuff you are talking about really well.
  • Joahua - Saturday, December 7, 2019 - link

    What is the use of Dram in ssd?

    Can i install dram less ssd for boot drive

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now