CPU Benchmark Performance: Legacy and Web

In order to gather data to compare with older benchmarks, we are still keeping a number of tests under our ‘legacy’ section. This includes all the former major versions of CineBench (R15, R11.5, R10) as well as x264 HD 3.0 and the first very naïve version of 3DPM v2.1. We won’t be transferring the data over from the old testing into Bench, otherwise it would be populated with 200 CPUs with only one data point, so it will fill up as we test more CPUs like the others.

The other section here is our web tests.

For the Core i3-12300, we are running DDR5 memory at the following settings:

  • DDR5-4800(B) CL40

Legacy

(6-1a) CineBench R10 ST

(6-1b) CineBench R10 MT

(6-2a) CineBench R11.5 ST

(6-2b) CineBench R11.5 MT

(6-3a) CineBench R15 ST

(6-3b) CineBench R15 MT

(6-4a) 3DPM v1 ST

(6-4b) 3DPM v1 MT

(6-5a) x264 HD 3.0 Pass 1

(6-5b) x264 HD 3.0 Pass 2

As we've seen throughout our testing, the Core i3-12300 does well in single-threaded performance. However, it does lack the grunt in multi-threaded applications compared with chips that feature more cores and threads.

Web

(7-1) Kraken 1.1 Web Test

(7-2) Google Octane 2.0 Web Test

(7-3) Speedometer 2.0 Web Test

In our web-based benchmarks, the Core i3-12300 performs brilliantly due to the higher IPC performance of Intel's Golden Cove P-cores on Alder Lake.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Encoding Gaming Performance: 1080p
Comments Locked

140 Comments

View All Comments

  • 29a - Thursday, March 3, 2022 - link

    No iGPU benchmarks, why?
  • Calin - Thursday, March 3, 2022 - link

    Integrated GPUs live or die by the memory bandwidth, and using DDR5 would bring a huge difference.
    On the other hand, DDR5 is more expensive and might not "fit" a low-budget computer.
    Basically, people that buy a cheap i3 with expensive RAM and no dedicated GPU aren't that many.
  • mode_13h - Thursday, March 3, 2022 - link

    As its iGPU has only 24 Execution Units, I doubt DDR5 will have such a momentous impact. Even if it does, there's still no way its iGPU performance is going to be terribly interesting or even competitive with 8 CU (512 shader) competition from AMD.
  • mode_13h - Thursday, March 3, 2022 - link

    By comparison, consider that Tiger Lake needed up to 96 EU of a roughly comparable iGPU architecture to eke out a win over AMD's 8 CU iGPUs. So, that should set a very modest expectation for the iGPU performance of these chips.
  • 29a - Thursday, March 3, 2022 - link

    If they would have benchmarked the iGPU we would know how it performs. I've heard for the last 2 years now how awesome Xe is going to be.
  • mode_13h - Thursday, March 3, 2022 - link

    Then you need only look for a review of Tiger Lake's iGPU. Alder Lake is only a minor refresh of it.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/16084/intel-tiger-l...
  • WaltC - Friday, March 4, 2022 - link

    They don't want to say how bad it is...;) Just another one of those inexplicable omissions AT seems to enjoy making in product reviews, I guess. Even if it's terrible, it should be demonstrated. Anyway, I'll say that Intel has a long and somewhat stagnant history of 2-4 core CPUs...;)
  • mode_13h - Saturday, March 5, 2022 - link

    Yeah, I think it could've done with a single page of 720p or 1080p benchmarks for a selection of relevant titles.
  • MDD1963 - Monday, April 25, 2022 - link

    "Intel has a long and somewhat stagnant history of 2-4 core CPUs" Must be quite frustrating from AMD fans seeing the 'stagnant' i3 occasionally defeat the 5600X in gaming benchmarks, too...
  • DannyH246 - Thursday, March 3, 2022 - link

    LOL - We all know why.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now