CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We leave the BIOS settings at default and memory at JEDEC timings for these tests, respective to the maximum supported DRAM frequency of the processor. This makes it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

Rendering - Blender 2.78: link

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

Our Blender testing has the EVGA FTW Micro landing in the middle of the pack completing the benchmark in 204 seconds. 

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

Our POV-Ray results have the Micro second to last, in front of its big brother in the FTW K. The difference here we found during our sanity checks was to see the CPU running at its base clock of 3.3 GHz throughout this testing. Typically, depending on the board, the 7900X CPU should run from 3.6-3.7 GHz, and the Micro is throttling back to the base clocks. According to Intel's XTU utility, this is due to current limit throttling. This curious phenomenon, which happens at stock speeds, goes away when overclocked, as indicated by the higher result.

Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.40

WinRAR results have the Micro as the second slowest of the bunch posting a time of 37.9 seconds, again behind the FTW K.   

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

Encoding: 7-Zip

For our 7-Zip results the Micro scores 58995 which is middle of the pack, and less than 1% away from the second spot. No anomalies here.  

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

The 3DPM results were also positive coming in 4th place and in the middle of the pack. 

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

In the DigiCortex testing, the FTW K managed 1.15 score which is more towards the middle of our results. There are seven boards within 0.02x fractions of real-time simulation of each other in this grouping. 

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • casteve - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link

    "This showcases one of the downsides of a HEDT system: while other platforms (like Z170) were getting under 100 regularly, the additional featureset of these large platforms results in a higher DPC Latency."

    I don't think it's the feature set. It just showcases that Intel failed to optimize for DPC latency with this chipset. eg: z77 good dpc latency, z87 bad, z97 and 170 good... sometimes Intel is on the ball, sometimes it isn't.
  • jabber - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link

    Excellent, a X299 board for the over 25's!
  • wolfemane - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link

    Hey some of us over 25's are kids at heart... and have kids. I love RGB. I'd happily add RGB to a system with this board.
  • DanNeely - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link

    OTOH even at 18 I'd've probably been like "Really?!?!?" Other than being brushed aluminum when that was still far from common the case I used for the system built right after my 20th was mundane as they come.
  • Samus - Saturday, February 10, 2018 - link

    Ditto. Even when I was a teenager I preferred the look of my corporate-class Prolinea or industrial design of a boxy Lian-Li to something with a window and lights. The most adventurous thing I've done is put a LED in my water pump so I can tell when the coolant is flowing.
  • peevee - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link

    Isn't having only 2 memory slots defeats the purpose of X299-compatible CPUs?
  • DanNeely - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link

    It has 4, 2 on each side. It's still quad channel so you get the double bandwidth vs the mainstream dual channel CPUs. You're still down 50% on capacity; but between the larger socket size of LGA20xx (AMD Epyc with a ~3500 pin socket is even worse, to the extent that something like half the board for it are the even larger E-ATX form factor that's rarely been used outside of 2 socket boards in the past) and all the extra stuff the bigger CPUs can support there's not enough space on the PCB to do everything that the CPU itself could do on anything smaller than a full ATX. Micro ATX with these CPUs requires picking and choosing what features you need instead of just taking everything.
  • Samus - Saturday, February 10, 2018 - link

    Basically, if you need more than 32GB of memory, you are better off spending more on a bigger board because the cost of high-density DDR4 will effectively kill any cost savings. ie, 4x8GB DIMMs are substantially cheaper than 2x16GB DIMMs.
  • cosmotic - Friday, February 9, 2018 - link

    On the first page: "This specific review will cover the ASRock X299E-ITX/ac." (probably pasted from said review to this one, which is for an EVGA board)
  • Joe Shields - Monday, February 12, 2018 - link

    Updated.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now