Final Words

The Ultrabook was launched in 2011 by Intel, and the form factor has gotten much better over the years due to the improved efficiency, thermals, and performance of the processors. The 13.3-inch category is very popular. The rise of convertibles has given people more flexibility in how they do their computing and it has been fun to watch the different designs over the years, which have been whittled down to two basic forms. A tablet which docks to a keyboard, and a notebook where the keyboard can fold under the display. Acer has taken a different road here with their U-Frame and it opens up a couple of extra modes in which the Aspire R 13 can operate in.

Any time a company bucks the trend and tries something new, it is certainly worth taking a look at. That does not always mean that the different design is going to be more beneficial though. The U-Frame hinge certainly has some advantages. It is very robust and makes for an overall better touch experience due to the display being mounted midway up its height. This helps a lot with bounce and deflection when compared to other touch screen Ultrabooks. I am also a big fan of Acer’s dual-torque hinge which makes it very easy to open the notebook, but stiffens up at 90° in order to allow you to use it with touch.

The two new modes that the U-Frame hinge brings are the “Ezel” mode and “Stand” mode. The stand mode is certainly the more useful of the two, and fits in well with the use of the active pen that Acer offers as an option for this device. It is very easy to put the device in stand mode and take notes with it. It is very similar to the Surface line in this regard.

I don’t think that either of these modes overcome the downsides of the U-Frame hinge though. Having to rotate the display inside the frame is a more intricate task than just flipping the display under like most convertible notebooks. Also, since the touch keyboard will not operate in either of these two unique modes, it really makes it hard to use either of them. It is a pretty important thing to be able to use the keyboard, and in both of these scenarios the physical keyboard is unusable. This is a major flaw and it is difficult to understand how this happened. There seems to be a hardware switch which kicks in and enables the touch keyboard when the device is flipped all the way into a tablet, or used in display mode, so it just appears to be an oversight by Acer that this hardware switch does not kick in sooner.

As a notebook, it is not particularly impressive either, with the extra width and mass of the U-Frame not doing it any favors. It is far from big or heavy, but there have been some very impressive devices launched this year to compare it against. Although the Gorilla Glass on the top cover is a nice effect, the rest of the device is hard touch plastic and lacks a wow factor. The keyboard is quite a ways off the leaders in this area, and the trackpad is also plastic, with competing devices at this price point often having glass trackpads which offer a smoother experience.

On a pure notebook, the more limited viewing angles of the PVA panel would not bother me as much, but we have become accustomed to tablets having great viewing angles. This same panel is, from what I can find, the same offered on the Acer S7, and in that device it would be fine. On this device though I found it to be a distraction.

Battery life is good, but not class leading. Most people should be happy with the battery life offered in this notebook, but considering it is larger and heavier that much of its competition, it is really too bad that a larger battery was not used, since the actual device efficiency is quite good.

In the end, I walk away from the Acer Aspire R 13 with the feeling that Acer is trying something new here, but it is not working as well as they had hoped. The design is certainly unique, but the drawbacks overshadow the small gains available. If the R 13 was a more budget offering, some of this could be written off to cost savings, but in the end the Aspire R 13 is not a budget convertible. The MSRP of the i5 model is $900 with a 128 GB SSD, and the i7 is $1300 with the higher resolution display and a 256 GB SSD. The top 512 GB model is $1500. Once you get to those prices there are some very good machines you are competing against, and in this instance it seems Acer has fallen short of the mark.

Wi-Fi, Speakers, and Miscellaneous
Comments Locked

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • jabber - Wednesday, June 17, 2015 - link

    Well...the main issue is..it's an Acer.

    No thanks. Seen too much of their bargain basement rubbish with mega bloatware installs.
  • BMNify - Wednesday, June 17, 2015 - link

    Decent ultrabook and gives another type of option to people who don't want Lenovo Yoga style or the standard notebook style of Dell XPS 13.
  • PenguinJim - Wednesday, June 17, 2015 - link

    I wish they'd release another in the R7-571 / 572 series - the "proper" R7 series with the keyboard at the front and the touchpad at the back.

    I hate using touchpads, and only found out when getting my R7 that some people do like them - I'd thought it was a universal hate, for some reason. But the R7 packed in an i5 (laptop, so dual-core, mind) and GT 750M (dedicated GDDR5 version) with a 15.6" 1080P screen (my favourite balance between size/resolution/legibility) and genuinely useful transformation modes, for under $1,000.

    I'd hoped they'd release a successor that included a numpad - my one great nitpick with the original. In fact, when I come to replace it in a few years, I'm dreading my options, as having the keyboard at the front and the used-twice-a-month touchpad at the back has been so great for me.

    But here they've just aped that old Dell format for hybrid laptops.
  • snolepard - Sunday, October 25, 2015 - link

    I have exactly the same point of view -criticism seemed to mostly come from people trying to use it unconventionally-although to be fair, when in ezel mode, a stylus or a touch app to improve precision without using a mouse was necessary.
    The failure of market acceptance is one of many examples of the revolutionary failing because the conventional trumps the visionary e.g. Salomon's quick lace system hasn't fully replaced regular laces even in their foot wear lines
  • steeve2679 - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - link

    If you are facing any problem with your Router such that your Router could not connect and configure your Acer computer and laptop follow Linksys Support here to solve your Router problem. And also here you can get the solution of any query related to your router connection.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now