Performance Evaluation - Rugged Thunderbolt

The Rugged Thunderbolt comes in various capacities (two SKUs come with hard drives, while the other two come with SSDs). One of the important aspects to remember is that the connectivity is with first generation Thunderbolt (as well as USB 3.0). This is completely acceptable, as the device is meant to be used standalone (or as the end device in a daisy chain setup). No SSD exists right now with the capability to saturate a 10 Gbps Thunderbolt link, so there is really no need to go the Thunderbolt 2 route (with the 20 Gbps links that may be helpful in daisy chained setups with a display being driven).

Unlike the 2big Thunderbolt 2, there is no RAID involved. The stress is on portability (bus-powered nature), ruggedness and performance.

LaCie Rugged Thunderbolt - Performance (MBps)
  USB 3.0 Thunderbolt 2
  Read Write Read Write
         
Photos 285.04 418.78 259.46 366.77
Videos 332.42 441.27 288.96 374.25
Blu-ray Folder 313.13 452.18 273.55 382.33
         
Adobe Photoshop (Light) 120.59 387.48 131.41 42.18
Adobe Photoshop (Heavy) 104.38 355.89 105.58 45.56
Adobe After Effects 147.84 78.17 137.9 13.35
Adobe Illustrator 142.66 299.61 139.69 36.3

One of the problems with SSDs is that performance may degrade over time, unless garbage collection / TRIM is activated on the SSDs. Availability of TRIM for external drives is a hit or miss. We checked for TRIM activation on the Rugged over both Thunderbolt and USB 3.0 connections using Vladimir Panteleev's TrimCheck tool.

On our particular testbed, we found that TRIM wasn't activated over Thunderbolt, but worked over the USB port directly off the PCH. These results are definitely dependent on the OS / nature of the end system and readers' mileage may vary.

Performance Evaluation - 2big Thunderbolt 2 Miscellaneous Aspects - RAID Rebuild and Daisy Chaining
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • MikhailT - Friday, July 11, 2014 - link

    WTF? You do realize these are DAS and has nothing to do with NAS nor does the devices have any server running?
  • mschira - Friday, July 11, 2014 - link

    I can't help finding this review a funny one. So the devices are faster via USB3 than with thunderbolt. (on a PC that is).

    So where is the usage scenario? Daisy chaining? Is that it? Am I unfair here or or is that ridiculous?
    So the verdict should be brutal, right? Am I missing the sentence? Because I can't see it.
    So where is the bottleneck?
    M.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now