The iOS 7 Review
by Brian Klug & Saumitra Bhagwat on September 19, 2013 1:25 AM ESTLike any major design change, iOS 7 definitely takes getting used to. My initial reaction to a lot of iOS 7 was honestly more surprise and aversion than I thought it would be, but over time the changes have grown on me. I like to think that we're pretty open to change, especially as enthusiasts, but it's a natural human response to want things to be familiar and closer to what came before. Considerable time spent running the beta and watching parts of the platform change over time in response to feedback from developers and other third parties makes me optimistic that the new iOS 7 UI will continue to change and evolve the same way previous versions did.
The flip side is that I can't shake the feeling that some of the iOS 7 design is reactionary. Pundits lambasted Apple with iOS 6 and the iPhone 5 release for being pretty much the same OS with minor tweaks and very few stylistic changes. Those vocal members wanted dramatic change in visual appearance just for the sake of having it, and like the idiom goes, be careful what you wish for because sometimes it actually does come true. No matter how you sugar coat it, iOS 7 is a dramatic departure from the visual style that came before.
I like the use of translucency and transparency, and the new eye candy and visual effects in iOS 7 did initially solicit a bit of the same "wow" reaction that I had the first time looking at iOS on the original iPhone. The use of parallax and the translucency really does convey a sense of depth and order without being as garish as drop shadows or the shiny faux-3d buttons of yesterday's iOS.
The downside is that after a few weeks of it, some animations are really just a lot more gratuitous than they need to be – after the thousandth time watching the tiles fly in or application zoom out into the multitasking interface you want it to just happen instantly. I have no doubt that iOS will go the route of OS X and Windows Phone and gradually increase the speed of these animations to make the platform feel faster. They're also bound to have a power penalty at some point.
I guess that's the ironic part – the flagship devices don't drop frames during the transitions, they just feel long. I can speak to iOS 7 performance which is good on the iPhone 4S and above and newest generation of iPads, performance however on the iPhone 4 and iPad 3 leaves a lot to be desired. The iPhone 4 stutters through all of its animations, has sparse use of transparency, and generally feels like it's on its last legs. The iPad 3 unfortunately is much of the same – sparse transparency, occasional stuttery parts throughout, although a lot more usable than the iPhone 4. I guess I'm just surprised to see the iPad 3 get to that point of feeling slow so fast.
Although a lot of iOS 7 is visual, the functional changes and new features that are standouts really do make a difference. Control center is a long overdue functional improvement that makes controlling a subset of commonly used settings very fast. There's still more Apple could do here to smooth over a few more friction points, but it's a welcome addition. Notification center also feels a lot more well thought out, with logical separation of information that's useful and notifications themselves, even if there's still no "clear all" button.
144 Comments
View All Comments
LuisPeres - Saturday, September 21, 2013 - link
It seems early to say how good is the new OS apart from design and a few features.Battery is an issue once more. Using some apps such as whatsapp, one sees the battery dropping at very high pace.
Another issue: does anyone tried to delete one song on iPhone? I'm not able to discover how ..
LuisPeres - Saturday, September 21, 2013 - link
Just another that occurred me now: we can't minimise the number os apps open. Why? Is this the reason why the phone now needs to be charged 2 or 3 times a day?NerdMan - Monday, September 23, 2013 - link
So, when Android releases a new major OS, it gets compared to iOS at every turn?http://www.anandtech.com/show/5310/samsung-galaxy-...
And when iOS releases their major overhaul, Android gets nary a mention? WTF?
Origin64 - Wednesday, September 25, 2013 - link
MIUI for Android had these colors, the transparancy, the buttons, the font, the entire look and feel of it, 2-3 years ago. I cant believe my eyes.Also, the iPhone 5S is still sub-HD, and scaling makes everything look horrible on LCD. Good luck watching video on that.
Wolfpup - Wednesday, September 25, 2013 - link
Wow, seeing them side by side, iOS 7 is amaaaazingly ugly and difficult to read compared with 6. I'm getting used to it, but it's just not as good visually (though does have some useful tweaks of course).Worst issue I've hit is iTunes 11.1 and iOS7 both butcher podcasts in different ways. You're forced to use the horrible podcasts program under iOS 7 now, though it's not as horrible as it was-actually seems to sync now. Worse, iTunes 11.1 massively breaks podcast functionality. Threads on it on various sites. It's like whoever did it has no idea what a podcast is...it's pre 2005 Apple level, which is to say, almost as bad as everyone else is at it now.
benrk - Wednesday, September 25, 2013 - link
Wow what a great review. Good OS, but I simply dismiss it because I cannot stand iOS.Oxford Guy - Friday, September 27, 2013 - link
iOS7, a poem:Change for change's sake.
Devolution.
If it ain't broke don't "fix" it.
Didn't you learn anything from Windows 8?
Bobohula - Saturday, September 28, 2013 - link
I miss the numbers on the tumbler for the timer and alarm. And the yellow legal notes with lines. All there is now is a white page for all of these. It was so clever before. Boring.Vespussi - Monday, September 30, 2013 - link
I did notice a big improvement in battery life on my 4S. Battery life is king and all the android geeks can take the back seat with their plastic "phablet" phones. It works and it was much need Os upgrade.Jajo - Tuesday, October 1, 2013 - link
E5-2697v2 vs E5-2690 +30% performance @+50% amount of cores. Disappointed...Don't get me wrong, I am aware that it's 200 Mhz in difference and the performance per watt ratio is great, but still...
I have the impression that single threaded performance has been decreased slightly or stands still with each generation, I had the same impression with the release of the last E5 generation compared to the X5690. I am well aware that there is a turbo available but it won't be so aggressive in an ESXi host and still, these days some VMs need single threaded performance.
Just my 2 cents