For the past week and a half our own Brian Klug has been hard at work on his review of HTC’s new flagship smartphone, the One. These things take time and Brian’s review, at least what I’ve seen of it, is nothing short of the reference piece we’ve come to expect from him.

In the same period of time I’ve been playing around with a retail HTC One and felt compelled to share my thoughts on the device. It’s rare that I’m so moved by a device to chime in outside of the official review, but the One is a definite exception. By no means is this a full review, and I defer to Brian for the complete story on the One - something we should be getting here in the not too distant future.

I’m not a financial analyst, but HTC hasn’t been doing all that well over the past few quarters. There’s a general feeling that the aptly named One is HTC’s last chance at survival. Good product doesn’t always translate into market dominance, but it’s a necessary component when you’re an underdog. Luckily for HTC, the One is great.

Design

Over the past two years HTC has really come into its own as far as design is concerned. The difference between the HTC One X and the plethora of flagships that came before it was remarkable. Moving to the One, the difference is just as striking.

I don’t seem to mind plastic phones as much as everyone else, but the One is in an appreciably different league compared to its peers. It’s the type of device that you just want to look at and touch. Given how much you do end up looking at and touching your smartphone, HTC’s efforts here seem well placed.

The One looks and feels great. The proportions are a little awkward in my hands, but I fully concede that’s going to vary from person to person. Despite the heavy use of aluminum, I don't feel overly worried about scratching/damaging the finish.

The challenge with any smartphone is to build something that looks distinct in a sea of black rectangles on a wall in a store. With the One (and arguably the One X before it), HTC does a good job of balancing the need to be seen with the need to be subtle. Elegant is the right word here.

While I’m sure there will be comparisons to the iPhone, the fact of the matter is that the design cycle on these smartphones falls somewhere in the 12 - 24 month range. With something as sophisticated as the One, you’re looking at the longer end of that spectrum. For what it’s worth, if I had to estimate I’d say design work on the One probably started before the iPhone 4S came out.

Smartphone Spec Comparison
  Apple iPhone 5 HTC One Samsung Galaxy S 3 Samsung Galaxy S 4
SoC Apple A6 1.3GHz Snapdragon 600 1.7GHz Snapdragon S4 1.5GHz Exynos 5 Octa (1.6/1.2GHz) or Snapdragon 600 1.9GHz
DRAM/NAND/Expansion 1GB LPDDR2, 16/32/64GB NAND 2GB LPDDR2, 32/64GB NAND 2GB LPDDR2, 16/32GB NAND, microSD 2GB LPDDR3, 16/32/64GB NAND, microSD
Display 4.0-inch 1136 x 640 LCD 4.7-inch SLCD3 1080p, 468 ppi 4.8-inch Super AMOLED 720p, 306 ppi 5-inch Super AMOLED 1080p, 441 ppi
Network 2G / 3G / 4G LTE Cat 3 2G / 3G / 4G LTE Cat 3 2G / 3G / 4G LTE Cat 3 2G / 3G / 4G LTE Cat 3 (depending on region)
Dimensions 123.8mm x 58.6mm x 7.6mm 137.4mm x 68.2mm x 4mm - 9.3mm 136.6mm x 70.6mm 8.6mm 136.6mm x 69.8mm x 7.9mm
Weight 112g 143g 133g 130g
Rear Camera 8MP 4MP w/ 2µm pixels 8MP 13MP
Front Camera 1.2MP 2.1MP 1.9MP 2MP
Battery Internal 5.45 Wh Internal 8.74 Wh Removable 7.98 Wh Removable 9.88 Wh
OS iOS 6.1.2 Android 4.1.2 Android 4.1.2 Android 4.2.2
Connectivity 802.11a/b/g/n, BT 4.0, USB 2.0, GPS/GNSS 802.11ac/a/b/g/n + BT 4.0, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, IR LED, MHL, DLNA, NFC 802.11a/b/g/n, BT 4.0, USB 2.0, NFC, GPS/GNSS, MHL 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (HT80) + BT 4.0, USB 2.0 NFC, GPS/GNSS, IR LED, MHL 2.0

 

The Camera
Comments Locked

434 Comments

View All Comments

  • Pylon757 - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link

    Um, Apple and their sapphire lenses?
  • uhuznaa - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    Sapphire glass cover over the lenses, not the lenses itself.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    glass covers front and back of the iphone shatterbricks...
    LOL
    crack !
  • jayseeks - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    Wow, you're an invalid.
  • tipoo - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    Correct, but if I remember right wasn't there a Sony phone with all glass elements?
  • JDG1980 - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link

    For all the concerns about smartphone camera quality, why haven't there been any phones that let you shoot images in RAW format? For anyone who wants to do serious post-processing, JPEGs simply aren't good enough. You need the full dynamic range captured by the sensor.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link

    Phone camera sensors don't have ANY dynamic range to speak of.
    That's why they are trying heavily the HDR stuff.
  • evonitzer - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    In an academic sense, it would be good to see the RAW results from phone cameras, but I have a feeling the results would be pretty hideous. The first manufacturer to release RAW will be praised by enthusiasts, but will be mobbed by the fake-enthusiasts for the amounts of noise coming off their sensors. Which will be copious.
  • danbob999 - Thursday, March 21, 2013 - link

    I find your conclusion pretty ironic. As if "enthusiasts" should prefer a phone that, according to you, looks better but the mass would prefer a phone with factual benefits (such as larger display, smaller size and larger battery).
    I would have said the opposite.
    "Mainstream" customers are those who buy phones that sucks only because they look good.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, March 22, 2013 - link

    That's the applefanboy argument - which includes "the feeeeeeeeeel".
    If they actually use a phone they won't notice the feeeeeel after a week if that long, more likely days.
    At that point the harsh appletard edges cut into your hands and finger tendons before the shatterbrick breaks when dropped.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now