Graphics: A substantial bump

There are three new GPUs in the new iMacs: the AMD Radeon 6750M, 6770M, and 6970M. Unlike their desktop counterparts, the 6750M and 6770M are true 6000-series GPUs, and not just rebadges of the 5750 and 5770 (though, as always, making direct comparisons between desktop and mobile parts remains difficult).

On the entry-level iMac, the 256MB Mobility Radeon HD 4670 has been replaced by a 512MB Radeon HD 6750M – you get double the graphics memory, a switch from GDDR3 to GDDR5, DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1, and OpenCL 1.1, as well as Eyefinity+ and UVD3 and the other Radeon 6000-series niceties. For gamers, this should substantially improve performance, especially if you’re interested in trying to game at the 21.5” iMac’s native 1920x1080 resolution.

Moving up the chain to higher-end models, the 512MB 6770M isn’t as big a step up from the previous generation’s 512MB Mobility Radeon 5670 – like the desktop cards, the 6770M is essentially a higher-clocked and gently tweaked revision of its previous-generation counterpart, and higher clocks are likewise all that separate it from the 6750M. You pick up UVD3, but a lot of the on-paper specs are the same. It’s still an improvement over the previous generation, but compared to the low end and (as we’ll see) the high end, it’s not as substantial.

And, finally, we’ve arrived at the high end 27” iMac, which gets a 1GB 6970M to replace last year’s 1GB Mobility Radeon 5750. The 5750 is more or less a midrange graphics part – the mobility 5600 and 5700 series GPUs all share the same core, codenamed Madison – but the 6970M is a true high-end part, complete with a 256-bit memory bus (compared to a 128-bit bus for the 5750) and more than double the shaders (960 in the 6970 versus 400 in the 5750). This, again, will drastically improve the new iMac’s utility as a gaming machine – the 6970M is much more capable of driving the 27” iMac’s 2560x1440 pixel display. Update: Further research has revealed that the 5750 that shipped in last year's iMac was in fact a rebadged member of the mobility 5800 series using the "Broadway" core instead of the "Madison" core used in Mobility 5600 and 5700 parts. The 5800 series has 800 shaders and not 400, so while the bump in the new 2011 iMac is still a decent one, it's not as monumental as previously reported.

For the 27” models with two Thunderbolt ports, the 6000-series GPUs will also enable the use of three displays simultaneously, which will be handy for the Final Cut and Photoshop junkies who often invest in the higher-end iMacs.


The last thing I want to talk about is the subtle factor looming over these refreshed computers: Lion.

OS X 10.7 is supposed to bring a lot of iOS features “back to the Mac” when it releases this summer, and since these Sandy Bridge Macs are going to be the first computers the new OS ships on, we’re seeing some preparation for it on the hardware end.

To drive the iOS inspired touch enabled features, each new iMac can come bundled with either the touch-enabled Magic Mouse or the Magic Trackpad at no extra cost (it’s your choice – the Magic Mouse is the default option). The vanilla Apple Mouse is still a selectable option, but will save you no money compared to its touch-enabled counterparts, which are more expensive at retail.

Apple is also beginning to push SSDs in its laptops to replicate the quick boot and shutdown times of iOS, and we’re beginning to see that in the new iMacs – while none of the computers include an SSD by default, you can configure all but the entry level to include a 256GB SSD as either the primary hard drive or a secondary drive. Characteristically, Apple hasn’t posted anything about the manufacturer of this drive or its controller – Apple uses Toshiba SSDs in the Sandy Bridge MacBook Pros, and recently switched to Samsung SSDs for the MacBook Airs, but there’s really no telling exactly what these iMacs are packing until it’s in your hands.

To replace the mechanical hard drive with a 256GB SSD costs a whopping $500 ($600 to get the SSD and keep the mechanical hard drive as well), though that’s not too far above the market price for an SSD at this capacity. Also note that, at this point, TRIM only seems to be enabled in OS X for SSDs direct from Apple – even if you can put in an SSD as an aftermarket upgrade, you may not be as satisfied with its performance. This may change in Lion, but we have no solid evidence to that effect.


With this refresh, Apple has done what Apple typically does: offer faster hardware in a similar physical package while maintaining price points across the board. Quad core processors and beefier dedicated GPUs make these better buys, relatively speaking, than last year’s models, but the iMac is still the iMac: a midrange-to-high-performance all-in-one with a high-quality display. Today’s upgrades do nothing to change the iMac lineup on a fundamental level.

That is to say, if you were in the market for an iMac already, congratulations! Today’s iMac is faster and more capable than yesterday’s iMac on all fronts. If an iMac isn’t what would best suit your purposes, though, today’s update won’t do much to change your mind unless you were looking for better gaming performance on the low and high ends.

For more about the nitty-gritty on the new iMac's performance and internals, keep an eye out for our in-depth review in the coming weeks.

Specs and CPUs
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Targon - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    There is a valid point about the false sense of security that Mac owners have. In the same way that people in rural areas do not feel a need to lock their doors, too many Mac people feel they don't need anti-virus software. Due to how many pieces of malware have been written for Windows machines, it has forced Microsoft to improve its products to lock it down and make it more difficult to infect.

    With that said, no system is completely immune, but MacOS really IS easier to infect than Windows 7 64 bit, and it is only because Apple marketshare outside of the USA is very very low, to the point where most malware authors don't pay attention to it.
  • nitro912gr - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    I don't disagree that no system is really safe, but as far as I use both platforms I have noticed that in windows it is more easy for something to sneak in and mess up.

    MacOS is a more closed environment with it's +/- it have. One of the + is that is not that easy for random virus to sneak in.
    However after windows vista I have noticed that windows too are more difficult to let something to sneak in.
    Still however I believe macOS is safer, for the very reason that is less popular and have less virus.

    So far I don't felt the need to get an antivirus for my macbook. Things happens, times changes however. Sooner or later it will be necessary.

    Here I want to notice that many people use pirated software and windows, and this give a thousand more ways for virus and maleware to sneak in, but they don't realize it and blame windows. This is wrong, windows have come a long way and are a mature system today, it is up to your needs or likes to which platform you will prefer in the end.
  • edsib1 - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    Your quoting from that article about the pwn2own hacking convention where OSX was the easiest OS to hack, and Safari the easiest browser arent u?

    I recognise that bit about rural people not locking their doors.
  • psychobriggsy - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    Are you barking mad?
  • edsib1 - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    A high-end price for performance that can at best be described as 'mid-range'.

    Having Thunderbolt (very useful atm) - but only USB 3.0 - bizarre!

    For $2000 - wheres my blu-ray recorder?

    Good improvement from last years range - but I just dont see why you buy an Apple.
  • edsib1 - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    yes I meant only USB 2.0 - bizarre! - but theres no edit button.
  • royalcrown - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    Actually the ( DUAL ) thunderbolt ports will have adapters to support USB 3.0 or firewire 800 and hDMI as well as DVI according to CNET. The 27 inch imacs also suppory HDMI input via an adaptor ( granted at native, 720, and 480p ), so at least it is and option. External BLU RAY players are $99 dollars if I want one.
  • edsib1 - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    please explain how u play a blu-ray on a mac...
  • royalcrown - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    Like this:

    <a href=" target="_blank"><img src=" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

    And you run it in windows of course...
  • royalcrown - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    or this since IE9 is sucking today:

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now