Graphics: A substantial bump

There are three new GPUs in the new iMacs: the AMD Radeon 6750M, 6770M, and 6970M. Unlike their desktop counterparts, the 6750M and 6770M are true 6000-series GPUs, and not just rebadges of the 5750 and 5770 (though, as always, making direct comparisons between desktop and mobile parts remains difficult).

On the entry-level iMac, the 256MB Mobility Radeon HD 4670 has been replaced by a 512MB Radeon HD 6750M – you get double the graphics memory, a switch from GDDR3 to GDDR5, DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1, and OpenCL 1.1, as well as Eyefinity+ and UVD3 and the other Radeon 6000-series niceties. For gamers, this should substantially improve performance, especially if you’re interested in trying to game at the 21.5” iMac’s native 1920x1080 resolution.

Moving up the chain to higher-end models, the 512MB 6770M isn’t as big a step up from the previous generation’s 512MB Mobility Radeon 5670 – like the desktop cards, the 6770M is essentially a higher-clocked and gently tweaked revision of its previous-generation counterpart, and higher clocks are likewise all that separate it from the 6750M. You pick up UVD3, but a lot of the on-paper specs are the same. It’s still an improvement over the previous generation, but compared to the low end and (as we’ll see) the high end, it’s not as substantial.

And, finally, we’ve arrived at the high end 27” iMac, which gets a 1GB 6970M to replace last year’s 1GB Mobility Radeon 5750. The 5750 is more or less a midrange graphics part – the mobility 5600 and 5700 series GPUs all share the same core, codenamed Madison – but the 6970M is a true high-end part, complete with a 256-bit memory bus (compared to a 128-bit bus for the 5750) and more than double the shaders (960 in the 6970 versus 400 in the 5750). This, again, will drastically improve the new iMac’s utility as a gaming machine – the 6970M is much more capable of driving the 27” iMac’s 2560x1440 pixel display. Update: Further research has revealed that the 5750 that shipped in last year's iMac was in fact a rebadged member of the mobility 5800 series using the "Broadway" core instead of the "Madison" core used in Mobility 5600 and 5700 parts. The 5800 series has 800 shaders and not 400, so while the bump in the new 2011 iMac is still a decent one, it's not as monumental as previously reported.

For the 27” models with two Thunderbolt ports, the 6000-series GPUs will also enable the use of three displays simultaneously, which will be handy for the Final Cut and Photoshop junkies who often invest in the higher-end iMacs.


The last thing I want to talk about is the subtle factor looming over these refreshed computers: Lion.

OS X 10.7 is supposed to bring a lot of iOS features “back to the Mac” when it releases this summer, and since these Sandy Bridge Macs are going to be the first computers the new OS ships on, we’re seeing some preparation for it on the hardware end.

To drive the iOS inspired touch enabled features, each new iMac can come bundled with either the touch-enabled Magic Mouse or the Magic Trackpad at no extra cost (it’s your choice – the Magic Mouse is the default option). The vanilla Apple Mouse is still a selectable option, but will save you no money compared to its touch-enabled counterparts, which are more expensive at retail.

Apple is also beginning to push SSDs in its laptops to replicate the quick boot and shutdown times of iOS, and we’re beginning to see that in the new iMacs – while none of the computers include an SSD by default, you can configure all but the entry level to include a 256GB SSD as either the primary hard drive or a secondary drive. Characteristically, Apple hasn’t posted anything about the manufacturer of this drive or its controller – Apple uses Toshiba SSDs in the Sandy Bridge MacBook Pros, and recently switched to Samsung SSDs for the MacBook Airs, but there’s really no telling exactly what these iMacs are packing until it’s in your hands.

To replace the mechanical hard drive with a 256GB SSD costs a whopping $500 ($600 to get the SSD and keep the mechanical hard drive as well), though that’s not too far above the market price for an SSD at this capacity. Also note that, at this point, TRIM only seems to be enabled in OS X for SSDs direct from Apple – even if you can put in an SSD as an aftermarket upgrade, you may not be as satisfied with its performance. This may change in Lion, but we have no solid evidence to that effect.


With this refresh, Apple has done what Apple typically does: offer faster hardware in a similar physical package while maintaining price points across the board. Quad core processors and beefier dedicated GPUs make these better buys, relatively speaking, than last year’s models, but the iMac is still the iMac: a midrange-to-high-performance all-in-one with a high-quality display. Today’s upgrades do nothing to change the iMac lineup on a fundamental level.

That is to say, if you were in the market for an iMac already, congratulations! Today’s iMac is faster and more capable than yesterday’s iMac on all fronts. If an iMac isn’t what would best suit your purposes, though, today’s update won’t do much to change your mind unless you were looking for better gaming performance on the low and high ends.

For more about the nitty-gritty on the new iMac's performance and internals, keep an eye out for our in-depth review in the coming weeks.

Specs and CPUs
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • psychobriggsy - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    I didn't realise that the white iMac that was last sold in 2007 is still your reference point for a 'boring white iMac'. Shiny white case - only the low-end MacBook is white these days. White poop - again, where's the white?

    You've probably got Foxconn components in your computer. If not, then the motherboard and other components was assembled elsewhere under worse conditions. It is only Apple and HP that force Foxconn to provide better working conditions, do checks on employee welfare, and so on.

    Glad you can make your PC look awful like the one in the link.
  • Targon - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    Mac users really need to understand that it is more of a religion than about which is the best. Back in the days of MacOS X vs. Windows XP, there was a fair argument that MacOS X was a better OS, but Windows has come such a long way since then that it is really hard to say that anymore.

    PCs have the advantage that we can mix and match parts, order replacements from all over, and UPGRADE our machines by doing a simple CPU swap in many cases. It is far easier for even a casual user to upgrade a video card or add memory on a PC, and while most people will not do that, it is nice that it can be done fairly comfortably by users with only a little bit of guidance, if they even need it.

    Macs come out of the box easier, but in general are not really better at this point, and there comes a point of stagnation that Apple has already hit in terms of improvements. Seriously, MacOS X, no matter what, is still MacOS X. In the same way that people were crying that they had to finally move away from Windows XP and go to Windows 7 and they couldn't handle the change in UI, what will happen if/when Apple finally releases a new OS? Will Apple users be able to cope with ANY change at this point?
  • alent1234 - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    who cares? Mac's retain their value so well that you can sell one every year and buy a new one and it will cost you less than most PC DIY upgrades.
  • Tamz_msc - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    Another stupid comment from someone who has no idea of what he's talking about.
    You can overhaul your system(CPU, GPU, HDD, RAM etc) and still it will cost half that of a new iMac.
  • PeteH - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    I think his point is that if you can sell your old Mac for more than half its original cost you come out ahead.
  • Tamz_msc - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    I guess Mac users will never understand the the efforts needed to make a PC look like the one I linked. You're blinded by fanboyism to understand such things.FYI I have an Intel CPU which are made in Malaysia, and an Intel motherboard which is made in China, and they're nearing four and a half years of usage without a single problem.
  • Wizzdo - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    So many PC users seem to have such a narrow view. Myself, as a developer and serviceman, I use Windows (because I have to due to legacy and saturation) and OS X "intensively" on a daily basis. I have 3 hand built PCs sitting right here in front of me. PC guys seem to think its rocket science to toss together a motherboard, ram, drive, power supply, fans and case and plug-it in the wall. Even the simplest application I've written is 10 times more involved.

    I know the statistics first hand and it is rare that I will recommend the Windows\obsoletePCbyTheTimeYouGetItHome to most users as I know the pain they are typically in for. And the results speak for themselves - happy users ALL of them. Not a single virus call. "Problems", if any, that can be solved within minutes over the phone.

    I could go on and on. PC users (and much of the world) see face value only (ugly as that face may be ;) and that's what they argue about. There is SO MUCH more to the user experience than a bucket full of bolts. If you use your computer daily and don't enjoy mucking around then Macs are the best value by a country mile for countless reasons.
  • araczynski - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    apple isn't about selling hardware/specs, its about selling an image, the hardware just has to be sufficient to maintain that image.
  • darwinosx - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    A display worth $1000 by itself.
    Much faster Sandy Bridge Procs.
    Thunderbolt which is dramatically faster and more useful than eSata and USB 3.0 which are dead technologies.
    4 GB of ram is more than enough for most and memory is cheap.
    Much faster gpu.
  • Sam Spade - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    Does this mean triple monitor? Finally Apple has caught on with the times. I still hate the idea of an all-0in-one as you just can't upgrade it at all in any way shape or form other than adding more RAM, but 3 monitors may make this relevant again, at last for graphic designers who don't really need a ton of power (Maya and Autocad guys run the fuck away).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now