Graphics: A substantial bump

There are three new GPUs in the new iMacs: the AMD Radeon 6750M, 6770M, and 6970M. Unlike their desktop counterparts, the 6750M and 6770M are true 6000-series GPUs, and not just rebadges of the 5750 and 5770 (though, as always, making direct comparisons between desktop and mobile parts remains difficult).

On the entry-level iMac, the 256MB Mobility Radeon HD 4670 has been replaced by a 512MB Radeon HD 6750M – you get double the graphics memory, a switch from GDDR3 to GDDR5, DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1, and OpenCL 1.1, as well as Eyefinity+ and UVD3 and the other Radeon 6000-series niceties. For gamers, this should substantially improve performance, especially if you’re interested in trying to game at the 21.5” iMac’s native 1920x1080 resolution.

Moving up the chain to higher-end models, the 512MB 6770M isn’t as big a step up from the previous generation’s 512MB Mobility Radeon 5670 – like the desktop cards, the 6770M is essentially a higher-clocked and gently tweaked revision of its previous-generation counterpart, and higher clocks are likewise all that separate it from the 6750M. You pick up UVD3, but a lot of the on-paper specs are the same. It’s still an improvement over the previous generation, but compared to the low end and (as we’ll see) the high end, it’s not as substantial.

And, finally, we’ve arrived at the high end 27” iMac, which gets a 1GB 6970M to replace last year’s 1GB Mobility Radeon 5750. The 5750 is more or less a midrange graphics part – the mobility 5600 and 5700 series GPUs all share the same core, codenamed Madison – but the 6970M is a true high-end part, complete with a 256-bit memory bus (compared to a 128-bit bus for the 5750) and more than double the shaders (960 in the 6970 versus 400 in the 5750). This, again, will drastically improve the new iMac’s utility as a gaming machine – the 6970M is much more capable of driving the 27” iMac’s 2560x1440 pixel display. Update: Further research has revealed that the 5750 that shipped in last year's iMac was in fact a rebadged member of the mobility 5800 series using the "Broadway" core instead of the "Madison" core used in Mobility 5600 and 5700 parts. The 5800 series has 800 shaders and not 400, so while the bump in the new 2011 iMac is still a decent one, it's not as monumental as previously reported.

For the 27” models with two Thunderbolt ports, the 6000-series GPUs will also enable the use of three displays simultaneously, which will be handy for the Final Cut and Photoshop junkies who often invest in the higher-end iMacs.


The last thing I want to talk about is the subtle factor looming over these refreshed computers: Lion.

OS X 10.7 is supposed to bring a lot of iOS features “back to the Mac” when it releases this summer, and since these Sandy Bridge Macs are going to be the first computers the new OS ships on, we’re seeing some preparation for it on the hardware end.

To drive the iOS inspired touch enabled features, each new iMac can come bundled with either the touch-enabled Magic Mouse or the Magic Trackpad at no extra cost (it’s your choice – the Magic Mouse is the default option). The vanilla Apple Mouse is still a selectable option, but will save you no money compared to its touch-enabled counterparts, which are more expensive at retail.

Apple is also beginning to push SSDs in its laptops to replicate the quick boot and shutdown times of iOS, and we’re beginning to see that in the new iMacs – while none of the computers include an SSD by default, you can configure all but the entry level to include a 256GB SSD as either the primary hard drive or a secondary drive. Characteristically, Apple hasn’t posted anything about the manufacturer of this drive or its controller – Apple uses Toshiba SSDs in the Sandy Bridge MacBook Pros, and recently switched to Samsung SSDs for the MacBook Airs, but there’s really no telling exactly what these iMacs are packing until it’s in your hands.

To replace the mechanical hard drive with a 256GB SSD costs a whopping $500 ($600 to get the SSD and keep the mechanical hard drive as well), though that’s not too far above the market price for an SSD at this capacity. Also note that, at this point, TRIM only seems to be enabled in OS X for SSDs direct from Apple – even if you can put in an SSD as an aftermarket upgrade, you may not be as satisfied with its performance. This may change in Lion, but we have no solid evidence to that effect.


With this refresh, Apple has done what Apple typically does: offer faster hardware in a similar physical package while maintaining price points across the board. Quad core processors and beefier dedicated GPUs make these better buys, relatively speaking, than last year’s models, but the iMac is still the iMac: a midrange-to-high-performance all-in-one with a high-quality display. Today’s upgrades do nothing to change the iMac lineup on a fundamental level.

That is to say, if you were in the market for an iMac already, congratulations! Today’s iMac is faster and more capable than yesterday’s iMac on all fronts. If an iMac isn’t what would best suit your purposes, though, today’s update won’t do much to change your mind unless you were looking for better gaming performance on the low and high ends.

For more about the nitty-gritty on the new iMac's performance and internals, keep an eye out for our in-depth review in the coming weeks.

Specs and CPUs
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • akm3 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    Umm, what you just bought does NOT match the specs the iMac, you only have a 1080p display, and it's only 23". That 27" 2560x1440p IPS display costs quite a chunk of change from Dell for example.

    Overall though, your point stands.
  • KoolAidMan1 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    The problem is that your specs do not match.

    Replace the LG 1080 display with a 27" 2560x1440 IPS display. They are $1000 from Apple, $1100 from Dell, or $1400 from NEC. Also don't forget to add the cost of the operating system.

    I reckon that going with the display in the 27" would close the price gap quite considerably.
  • iwod - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    You need a 27" Screen
    A LED Backlight - Many of them are still CCFL
    H-IPS , some of them are still E-IPS

    You haven't included the Ultimate version of Windows 7
    A Decent Keyboard and Mouse.

    Your spec doesn't have Bluetooth and WiFi.

    Your Spec isn't very Green, No EPEAT Gold and Energy Star 5.2.

    You haven't included Casing, Please Add a decent Aluminum Case.

    Please add a decent pair Speakers in.

    You spec computer is 5 times larger in Volume compare to an iMac.

    There, a list of difference, if dont care about any of the above and value other things. Then by all count take a PC.
  • psychobriggsy - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    Well done, so your home built system turns out to be cheaper, and have different specifications. No bluetooth keyboard/mouse though.

    If you buy an iMac, the 27" is the one to go for. A 27" 2560x1440 monitor costs over $800 on its own, making the rest of the computer cost far more palatable, and in the long run it can be used as a monitor too, increasing its longevity.

    And whilst you might not care, many people do care about aesthetics, and the iMac does look better than a pile of components plugged together on a desk (you didn't buy a case it appears).
  • alent1234 - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link


    a 27" LCD is another few hundred dollars, the top of the line iMac is a 6970, comes with an OS that rivals Win 7 Ultimate since it has AD connectivity and other features that Home Premium doesn't have and comes with software that will run you $200 or so

    apple is just taking the revenue for itself instead of offering software from others and doing a classic upsell by gimping the lower end iMacs
  • TEAMSWITCHER - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    And what you have is a hodge-podge of components from multiple vendors. An iMac is a totally different type of computer.
  • darwinosx - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    Heh, nobody cares what you just bought.

    But enjoy Microsoft's latest mediocrity of an OS. No service or support. Substandard monitors etc.
  • Casper42 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    Its a Mac, of course you are getting ripped off.

    Perhaps one of these days they will start charging more for OSX and less for the hardware and let other people play in their sandbox.
  • Spazweasel - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    When it comes down to where they make their money, Apple is a hardware company, not a software company. Having OS/X run only on Apple hardware sells Apple hardware. Why in the world would they want to change that? Why would they add the burden of having to support every piece of random hardware that Joe' Sound Card and Floor Wax Company produces? Why would they want to go from being a company with half again Microsoft's market cap to one tenth?

    Apple's customers are happy. They're not "stupid" or "in a reality distortion field". And they are most certainly not being ripped off. They buy Macs because Windows and the chaotic PC hardware vendor market is a drain of time and effort. Time spend crawling PC hardware sites,, updating drivers, periodically reinstalling their operating system and dealing with compatibility issues is something Apple users see as a waste of time and efftort. Apple users would rather spend doing what they bought the computer for in the first place. Apple users are not interested in the metatask of managing the computer or the operating system.

    A car that needs to spend a weekend per month in the shop and periodically have an engine rebuild is not better than one you just drive for a year between oil changes. Same principle applies to computers, and to Apple users, that's worth some extra money up front. Sitting on the sidelines yelling "YOU'RE NOT AS HAPPY AS YOU THINK YOU ARE!" doesn't make it so.
  • Dex1701 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link just did the same thing by WAAAY over-exaggerating the amount of work and headaches that go into owning a PC. I'm not taking sides...both the PC and Apple markets exist for different types of people. Just wanted to go ahead and point out the "YOU'RE NOT AS HAPPY AS YOU THINK YOU ARE!" hypocrisy of that post. My Windows machines don't require any more maintenance or babysitting than my Macbook does. The fact is that most PC hardware isn't priced at as much of a premium as Apple hardware usually is. That's fine...they make some pretty sexy hardware, but for someone that has a good amount of hardware tech experience there's no reason to shell out for it unless you're hellbent on running MacOS.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now