After a Vacation with the SD14

Whatever the motivations, the Sigma SD14 is a paragon of simplicity. In a very short time you feel comfortable with the limited controls. The possible exception is the combo on and drive mode dial on the top left. It is easy enough to use, but it is so different from competing cameras that it takes a while to get used to. There are no scene modes to choose and no programs to analyze scenes; you end up doing many things the old-fashioned way - tweaking them yourself. The simplicity is a nice feature in vacation shooting, but you are almost forced to engage your mind in shooting, which is certainly not a bad thing. Auto-Focus is not the fastest, but it is a great improvement over the earlier SD models. Fortunately the new 5-point AF seems to be very accurate.

Exposure control is decent, but it is nowhere as sophisticated as current models from competitors. However, by shooting in RAW and processing in Sigma Photo Pro you can almost always recover from any errors in exposure or judgment. There is tremendous flexibility in exposure adjustments with the RAW images. The auto setting is also very good and is usually enough to create decent TIF or JPG images from the RAW files.

As we said in our review, the Sigma SD14 is a huge refinement of everything Sigma SD that came before it. It is solidly built, well balanced, and easy to handle, with features that are much more contemporary and competitive than the SD10. These include a viewfinder based on a real pentaprism with 98% accuracy in the view. The viewfinder is definitely one of the most significant improvements in the SD14, and we thoroughly enjoyed using it.

It's a good thing the optical viewfinder is decent, since the 130,000 pixel 2.5" LCD is exceptionally crude. After working with the gorgeous hi-res 3" LCD on the Nikon D300 and Sony A700 it is hard to find anything good to say about the Sigma LCD. Fortunately you can see if you captured an image, and the capture is likely RAW so seeing it on the LCD doesn't matter too much. If you like to edit on the LCD screen it won't really be an option on the SD14.

Getting away from nit picking, I confess I really had a lot of fun with the SD14 on vacation. There were times when I could have gotten better shots with a Nikon D300 or Canon 40D, but I also did more "thinking" shots than usual because the SD14 demanded it for best results. Vacation is not a place where you normally shoot action sports so the slow display and write speeds were not a real issue. The 6-frame buffer was also enough for any sequences that were shot.

When the SD10 was in our hands for a few weeks it was just too annoying to learn to use and love. The SD14 is a lot easier to live with - if you accept its shortcomings and you are willing to work with it to reveal the strengths of the Foveon sensor. Some will be perfectly happy using the SD14, and others will complain bitterly about its shortcomings and quickly move on.

The lock-up problems we experienced early in our review never happened again once we switched to compatible CF cards. Going from many hard lockups to none has convinced us that those who are having lockup issues with the SD14 need to do some CF swapping to see if that may be their issue. The SD14 drove us nuts until the CF card swap; after the swap it behaved extremely well and actually became a fun camera to use. It's true that CF compatibility is better on most other cameras, but flash memory is cheap enough that if you're willing to invest in an SD14 adding a compatible CF card is easy enough.

What did using the Sigma SD14 on vacation teach us? It wasn't anything new, but we were again reminded that the camera matters a lot less than the skill of the person using the camera. Bells and whistles are great, but they are just tools and not a substitute for learning to take good images. We don't often work in RAW unless it is a critical image or the JPG is just too distant from our mental image to get to a usable final image. Working completely in RAW with the SD14 was another reminder of how much can be accomplished in RAW with just a little effort.

The Sigma SD14 is not for everyone, but it is definitely a useful tool for deliberate shooting and for those who want to exploit the "unique look" of Foveon images. We won't get into the argument of whether the Foveon color is more accurate, because we're not sure. When the Foveon is good it can be very good, but just as often the color misses the real scene and creates its own world of color. More often than not you can still capture the mental color you saw in processing the RAW files, but it is really a lot more fun to exploit the unique color world of the Foveon sensor.

Yes, you can shoot a vacation with a Sigma SD14, and you might even have some fun doing it. There are faster and more capable DSLR cameras, but if you have the time nothing else is quite like the Foveon sensor. It also helps if you are exploring the half-Dutch half-French island of St. Maarten, or if you are visiting the nearby trendy French island of St. Barts or enjoying the raw beauty of Saba or Anguilla.

ISO 800 as a Creative Tool
Comments Locked

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    Most of the images are straight out of Auto mode in RAW processing with Sigma Photo Pro. I did sometimes push sharpness or exposure a notch or tow but nothing drastic.

    I did a lot more Post Processing with the ISO 800 images, since my goal with the ISO 800 shots was to be creative with noise and color shifts.

    I'm also a fan of Olympus color. I find the color accuracy of the E3 to be remarkable.
  • strikeback03 - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    Is that adapter supposed to be a high-speed one? When I bought one a few years ago I got a Jobo brand one from B&H, as they actually advertise a high transfer speed as opposed to the options on Ebay. Works fine (and quickly) with SD cards, no SDHC though. Recently bought another Jobo one that claimed SDHC support, however that did not work with Sandisk Extreme III SDHC cards in either my camera bodies or card readers.

    I recently visited England, Ireland, and Italy with friends and brought a 40D and Sigma 18-200 OS and 10-20EX lenses. The 18-200 does work out nicely when photography is not the main point of the trip.
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    The adapter is high speed in the limited testing I have done with it. I did not see an obvious write slowdown or increased format times compared to a similar high-speed CF on a Nikon D300 or Olympus E3. It also converts an SDHC that can then be easily read in a CF slot even if the reader does not support SDHC. I also have the older SD converter that you mention, but it doesn't support SDHC at all.
  • neilvan - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    I have a Jobo CF - SDHC adapter that I bought from B&H Photo a couple of months ago and it works great with my Patriot 16GB SDHC in my SD14.

    It saves me a bundle, SDHC cards are so inexpensive!

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/462559-REG/J...">http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/4...ure_Digi...
  • strikeback03 - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    Yeah, that's the one I tried (though the photo shows the old version I own, not the newer one I ordered this time). I only had Sandisk Extreme III cards to try with it (3 4GB, 1 8GB, took advantage of the rebates and was bringing adapter and some cards to friends in England) and it did not work at all with the SDHC cards, was fine with normal SD. Didn't have time to try and make it work, so I returned it.

    Wesley, thanks for the link.
  • strikeback03 - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    What brand is it and/or where did you get it from? I now have an 8GB SDHC card that doesn't do me much good without a functional SDHC adapter.
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    Here is a source for the same item in Hong Kong on eBay at http://cgi.ebay.com/SDHC-SD-MMC-to-Compact-Flash-C...">http://cgi.ebay.com/SDHC-SD-MMC-to-Comp...6QQssPag.... I have bought from this seller before and they were fast and reliable. There are also several new converters showing on an eBay search for SDHC to CF converter, but I don't have any personal experience with the other brands.
  • mmntech - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    I loved St Martin when I was there back in 2001. You didn't take the camera to Orient Beach did you? lol. (There's a well known "clothing optional" beach in the area)

    Sigma has always made good lenses. It's too bad the camera was a let down. I'm still in the photography stone age with my Pentax KM 35mm SLR. I have a quite a few good pics I took in St Martin with it.
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    I have been to St. Maarten several times and I keep going back because it is one of my favorites. Orient Beach is a normal stop on the Island, but I rarely take photos there. We stay in Philipsburg on the Dutch side and normally dine in Grand Case on the French side. Orient Beach is about halfway between the two.

    The SD14 was not really a complete letdown - you just have to work within its limitations, which are many. After returning I captured equipment images for this article with a Nikon D300. It was a stark reminder of why the SD14 competes better at around $600 than it did at the $1699 Sigma was asking when it was first introduced.

    It is still an interesting sensor for those who have the time to "play" or "create" depending on your perspective.
  • pervisanathema - Thursday, June 19, 2008 - link

    Thanks for the article, now I definitely know which camera to not buy.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now