Memory Test Configuration

Recent memory testing has used the ASUS P5D-DH Deluxe, which is based on the Intel 975X chipset. We did all initial testing on that platform, to provide results that can be conveniently compared to earlier test results. However, with the evolution of the Intel P965 chipset and the NVIDIA 680i, it is clear that higher memory speeds can be achieved with different memory "straps" used for the highest ratio settings on those chipsets. The P5W-DH Deluxe is very demanding of memory at high speeds and the "looser" base ratios used at the top of most P965 and 680i boards allow higher memory overclocks with some memory modules.

This is another way of saying that some recently released memory is tweaked for and performs best on the Intel P965 platform. This is truer today as the P965 has slowly matured into a chipset providing much better memory compatibility, performance, and flexibility than was seen on early P965 motherboards.

Recently the NVIDIA 680i chipset has demonstrated an even greater range of performance at the top of memory overclocking, with extremely flexible options for squeezing the most performance from almost any memory. A cross-section of Enthusiast memory manufacturers was also asked which motherboard performed best with their top DDR2 memory. In all cases the answer that came back was the NVIDIA 680i motherboard.

For these reasons, we recently revised test procedures in DDR2 memory reviews. In the new procedure standard memory performance and overclocking are first tested on the ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe. This allows valid comparisons to earlier reviews of DDR2 memory on the Core 2 Duo platform. We then run overclocking tests only on the NVIDIA 680i test platform, using the same X6800 Core 2 Duo processor.

The Intel platform was used because the first generation of AM2 on-processor memory controller does not support any memory timings below 3, or memory speeds above DDR2-800. Both these features are supported on the ASUS 975X motherboard. Timings of 2 are available for RAS-to-CAS and RAS Precharge, and DDR2-1067 is an available memory ratio. In addition it was clearly illustrated in Conroe vs. AM2: Memory & Performance that DDR2 memory performance, in timings and required voltage, are equivalent on the AM2 and Core 2 Duo platforms.

The memory test bench uses the following components:

Memory Performance Test Configuration
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo X6800
(x2, 2.93GHz, 4MB Unified Cache)
RAM: 2x1GB Corsair Dominator PC2-10000C5DF
2x1GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8888C4D
2x1GB OCZ PC2-9200 Flex XLC (DDR2-1150)
2x1GB Patriot DDR2-1066
2x1GB Super Talent DDR2-1000
2x1GB Team DDR2-1000
2 x1GB Corsair CM2X1024-6400C3
2x1GB OCZ Ti Alpha PC2-8000 VX2
Motherboards: ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe (Intel 975X)
EVGA NVIDIA nForce 680I SLI
Hard Drive: Hitachi 250GB SATA2 enabled (16MB Buffer)
Video Card: 1 x EVGA 7900GTX - All Standard Tests
Video Drivers: NVIDIA 91.47
CPU Cooling: Tuniq Tower 120
Power Supply: OCZ PowerStream 520W
Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2

We will continue this test procedure until we can fully evaluate the NVIDIA 680i and recent Intel P965 boards as a potential replacement for the Intel 975X as our memory test platform. Our testing has shown different straps at high memory speeds can yield memory bandwidth results that may vary as much as 20% at the same memory speed - particularly in the standard buffered Sandra 2007 memory bandwidth test. Variations in Unbuffered Sandra tests, Super Pi, and real-world game tests are much smaller with different straps at the same memory speed, however, with small variations near the accuracy limits of our test procedures.

Test results have also shown with some memory the P965 and/or NVIDIA 680i performed much better than the 975X in memory speed, but where the P965/680i performance was still the same or less than the 975X. The ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe appears the more demanding platform in terms of memory straps, but it also often yields better performance at the same memory speed. Testing will continue to look more closely at the impact of memory straps on performance and memory test platforms will be revised with the move to Vista.

Value DDR2-800 kits from both G.Skill and Super Talent were recently reviewed. Since those two memories are really a different category than top-line DDR2, results for those two memories are not included in comparisons in this review. For comparisons of performance of those two memories you can refer to the linked reviews.

Corsair Dominator Twin2x2048-10000C5DF Stock Memory Performance
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    We make no attempt in our memory testing to max out the overclock on the CPU. In general we try to choose settings that will yield CPU speeds that are consisitent and relatively near stock speed - so they can be compared to other results.

    This CPU can OC with stability to 3.9 to 4.0 GHz as you saw in our Tuniq 120 Tower review. Running memory at high overclocks combined with high CPU overclcoks will definitely produce much higher benchmark numbers. However, the reality remains that the memory component alone contributes much less to high performance than CPU speed or the GPU used in benchmarking.

    If you look closely at performance results for the 680i on p.4 you will see we included both 1:1 (same speed, really 1:2) and 5:4 linked ratio tests. The 5:4 has 20%+ higher buffered bandwidth at DDR2-1315 than the 1:1 measures at the same DDRS-1315, yet gaming performance is almost the same. Memory does make a difference in performance, but memory speed matters much less on C2D and AM2 than it did on previous processors.
  • sdsdv10 - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    quote:

    Memory does make a difference in performance, but memory speed matters much less on C2D and AM2 than it did on previous processors.


    They why are companies working so hard to bring out the ultra-fast, ultra-expensive memory modules?
  • coldpower27 - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    Bragging rights, and premium prices. They are also trying to prey on the misinformed who don't know any better.
  • Sunrise089 - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    Are you just posting to brag? That's definately a nice PC you have, but how does it compare to the one in the review? You have a much more overclocked processor AND a generation more GPU power.
  • semo - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    the second page has "2x2048" in the title. is that the name of the product? wasn't the test done on 2x1024 kit whereas the title suggests a 4gb kit.
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    If you check the chart on page 1 you will see Twin2x2048-10000C5DF is the Corsair Part Number for this 2GB kit with 2x1GB dimms and a Dominator Airflow fan. It has become common in the memory industry to sell memory in pairs rated by the capacity of the pair of dimms. We agree this can be confusing, but we used the Corsair Part Number to identify the modules since readers have asked us for that info in past reviews.
  • semo - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    thanks Wesley, i had a feeling it was something like that. i'll pay more attention next time.
  • Live - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    What if you put this in the DFI Lanparty UT ICFX3200-T2R/G does it beat the 680i?
  • tuteja1986 - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    Good memory but way too expensive. I would rather buy 8800GTX.
  • tayhimself - Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - link

    Who buys this junk anyway?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now