CPU Benchmark Performance: Legacy and Web

In order to gather data to compare with older benchmarks, we are still keeping a number of tests under our ‘legacy’ section. This includes all the former major versions of CineBench (R15, R11.5, R10) as well as x264 HD 3.0 and the first very naïve version of 3DPM v2.1. We won’t be transferring the data over from the old testing into Bench, otherwise, it would be populated with 200 CPUs with only one data point, so it will fill up as we test more CPUs like the others.

The other section here is our web tests.

We are using DDR5 memory at the following settings:

  • DDR5-4800(B) CL40

Legacy

(6-1a) CineBench R10 ST

(6-1b) CineBench R10 MT

(6-2a) CineBench R11.5 ST

(6-2b) CineBench R11.5 MT

(6-3a) CineBench R15 ST

(6-3b) CineBench R15 MT

(6-4a) 3DPM v1 ST

(6-4b) 3DPM v1 MT

(6-5a) x264 HD 3.0 Pass 1

(6-5b) x264 HD 3.0 Pass 2

In our legacy section of the suite, both the Core i7-12700K and Core i5-12600K perform well in older benchmarks. It's worth pointing out that all of Intel's 12th Gen Core series processors do well here, with the combination of high core frequency, core count, and IPC performance all playing its part.

Web

(7-1) Kraken 1.1 Web Test

(7-2) Google Octane 2.0 Web Test

(7-3) Speedometer 2.0 Web Test

Looking at performance in our web-based tests, the three premium K SKUs in Intel's Alder Lake stack once again shows its dominance over the rest of the competition.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Encoding and Compression Gaming Performance: iGPU
Comments Locked

196 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gondalf - Wednesday, March 30, 2022 - link

    Try to drop AVX, and your power figure change absolutely. This AMD propaganda is stunning.
  • tamalero - Wednesday, March 30, 2022 - link

    Do you even know what "Propaganda" is?
  • 29a - Thursday, March 31, 2022 - link

    Or Gondalf you could just turn off the computer and power would really drop dramatically.
  • OreoCookie - Thursday, March 31, 2022 - link

    I thought that Intel’s current big.little designs do not support AVX, because the small cores don’t.
  • mode_13h - Friday, April 1, 2022 - link

    > I thought that Intel’s current big.little designs do not support AVX, because the small cores don’t.

    It's AVX-512 they dropped. Gracemont (the E-core in Alder Lake) is actually the first Intel "little" core to support AVX/AVX2. And because it lacks AVX-512, Intel actually added a couple more regular AVX instructions, for special-purposes (deep learning) that had only so far been by AVX-512.
  • mode_13h - Friday, April 1, 2022 - link

    Oh, and if you didn't know, AVX and AVX2 are both 256-bit. AVX basically provides instructions for operating on 8-element fp32 vectors, while AVX2 adds operations on 4-element fp64 vectors and various sizes of integer vectors.

    This mirrors what Intel did with SSE and SSE2, where SSE was introduced with the Pentium 3 and SSE2 was introduced with the Pentium 4. Before SSE2, you'd have to use (64-bit) MMX for vector operations on integers, but MMX had various downsides (besides the width).
  • MDD1963 - Friday, April 1, 2022 - link

    "Keep in mind that Zen 4 is coming later this year and will make Alder Lake 2nd again. " Pretty sure that is not all that is coming out this year. (Raptor Lake) But, the difference is, I'm not really on a side, and wish both do well, and, honestly, although I seem to root for Intel, no one can deny 5600X on up are good products. Quibbling over the 5-10% differences is almost pointless.
  • Rezurecta - Friday, April 1, 2022 - link

    COMPLETELY disagree that AMD approach looks rudimentary. The intel design is impressive and them making it work in an x86 architecture is great! That thread director (or whatever its called) is really cool and I can't wait to see how they develop it and optimize it in future setups. However, Intel is using a design setup that mobile parts have been using for years in having big little. They have a very power hungry design. A process node that is archaic compared to TSMC 7nm and smaller. And finally not being able to move away from expensive monolithic design. Chiplets are the future and AMD lead the way in that!

    Granted I will say 100% I am very impressed that Intel was able to do what they did with the tools in hand, but to call AMD design rudimentary is inaccurate.

    The true test for 12th gen is the low power U series that will be in thin and light laptops. The fact that they haven't released it yet and started with a desktop alternative laptop processor is worrisome. To me that chip was just throwing 100W+ in a laptop that is completely useless for 99% of the user base to impress people, but it isn't the reality of what their laptop lineup will look like.

    It is an interesting time and I'm glad there is competition in the space!
  • Mike Bruzzone - Tuesday, April 5, 2022 - link

    I'm monitoring all of AL mobile. mb
  • Blastdoor - Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - link

    Will there be a review of the Mac studio with M1 Ultra? If not, I’ll stop checking the site.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now