It’s that time of the year again. We’ve made it past the first half of 2019 and all vendors have released their initial flagship devices for the year. Samsung was amongst the first to usher in the new generation with the Galaxy S10, S10+ and S10e, and as has been traditional for many years, it’s now time for a refresh of Samsung’s second flagship lineup - the Galaxy Note. Today Samsung is unveiling two new devices: the new Galaxy Note10 and Note10+, marking a significant departure from its usual Note device formula.

The last time that Samsung has diverged from its single Note device model strategy was back in 2014 when the company had unveiled the new Galaxy Note Edge alongside the Note 4. Back then the company had used the diverging model to promote the curved screen design, which was still a new feature at the time. This year, Samsung again is releasing two models of the Note, however this time around, the company is differentiating the Note10 and Note10+ in terms of device size, much like on the mainline Galaxy S series of the last few years. Unlike the S-series however, the two new Note10’s also differ from each other in terms of some features, some which are unexpected and likely to raise quite a few eyebrows.

Naturally, the hallmark feature of the Note series is still very much present in both phones: The integrated pen stylus continues to evolve and this year brings new features such as air gestures.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Series
  Note10 Note10+
SoC (North America, China, Japan)

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 
1x Kryo 485 (Cortex-A76) @ 2.84GHz
3x Kryo 485 (Cortex-A76) @ 2.42GHz
4x Kryo 485 (Cortex-A55) @ 1.80GHz

Adreno 640 @ 585MHz
(Europe & Rest of World)

Samsung Exynos 9825
2x Exynos M4 @ 2.73GHz
2x Cortex-A75 @ 2.4GHz
4x Cortex-A55 @ 1.95GHz

Mali G76MP12 ? MHz
Display 6.3-inch
2280 x 1080 (19:9)
(curved edges)
3040 x 1440 (19:9)
(curved edges)
SAMOLED, HDR10+, 1200nits peak brightness
Dimensions 151 x 72 x 7.9 mm
168 grams
162.3 x 77.4 x 7.9 mm
196 grams
NAND 256GB 256/512GB
- + microSD
Battery 3500mAh (13.45Wh) typical
3400mAh (13.09Wh) rated

25W Charging
4300mAh (16.55Wh) typical
4170mAh (16.05Wh) rated

45W Charging
Primary Front Camera

10MP Dual-Pixel
4K video recording

Secondary Front Camera -
Rear Camera
77° Regular Angle
12MP 1.4µm Dual Pixel PDAF

Tri-stack CMOS Sensor (Embedded DRAM),
4K60, 1080p240, 720p960 high-speed recording

Adjustable aperture f/1.5 or f/2.4
OIS, auto HDR, LED flash
Rear Camera
123° Wide Angle
16MP 1.0µm f/2.2
Rear Camera
45° / Telephoto lens 2x zoom
12MP 1.0µm f/2.1,
Rear Camera
- Time-of-Flight sensor
4G Modem Snapdragon X24 LTE (Snapdragon Integrated)
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 20/13)
DL 2000 Mbps (7x20MHz CA, 256-QAM),
 UL 316 Mbps (2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM)

Shannon LTE (Exynos Integrated)
2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 20/13)
DL 2000 Mbps (8x20MHz CA, 256-QAM),
 UL 316 Mbps (3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM)
5G Modem - Snapdragon X50 /
Exynos Model 5100
5G model variants only
SIM Size NanoSIM
Dual NanoSIM/Hybrid SIM/microSD
(Certain models, µSD + only)
Wireless 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax 2x2 MU-MIMO,
BT 5.0 LE, NFC, GPS/Glonass/Galileo/BDS
Connectivity USB Type-C
no 3.5mm headset
Special Features Under-screen ultrasonic fingerprint sensor
heart-rate sensor, face unlock,
fast charging (Qualcomm QC 2.0, Adaptive Fast Charging, USB-PD),
wireless charging & reverse charging (WPC & PMA),
IP68 water resistance
Launch OS Android 9.0 with Samsung OneUI
Launch Prices 256GB / 4G:
$949 / £899 / 949€
256GB / 4G:
$1099 / £999 / 1099€

512GB / 4G:
$1199 / 1199€

256GB / 5G:
$1299 / £1099

512GB / 5G:
$1399 / £1199

On the hardware side of things, this year we’re actually seeing the SoCs inside the new Note actually diverge from what was used in the Galaxy S10 series – with the Exynos in particular being quite different. Samsung continues to dual-source SoCs both from Qualcomm and its own SLSI division. For the North American market, China and Japan, the Note10 and Note10+ come with the Snapdragon 855 processor which we've come to know from the S10.

The rest of the world however gets a totally new SoC. Whilst the S10’s Exynos 9820 came in a 8nm process node which seemed to slightly lag behind the 7nm efficiency of the Snapdragon 855, the new Note10’s come with a brand new Exynos 9825 refresh that Is manufactured on Samsung’s new 7nm EUV process node. In effect, this will be the very first EUV consumer silicon in the world. Whilst manufactured on the new node, the new chip doesn’t radically change its IP and thus looks very much similar to the 9820. Samsung did make some minor changes such as clock the middle CPU cores higher to 2.4GHz, and also promises that the GPU is now clocked higher, however we should be expecting evolutionary rather than revolutionary performance changes. It’s likely that Samsung invested the process node advantages into more power efficiency – an area the 9820 lagged behind the Snapdragon 855 in.

The Note10 is abandoning the microSD card – however Samsung looks to have not put storage at a disadvantage as the new phones come with an extremely large base storage of 256GB. The Note10+ still retains the microSD, and also comes with a 512GB storage option.

Great new screen design - but 1080p for the Note10

The Note10+ supersizes its screen and is now of a 6.8” diagonal, bigger than that of the Note9. In fact the device has grown over the Note9, being 1mm wider and nearly as much taller, although the footprint size increase isn’t as notable as the screen size increase, thanks to the significantly smaller bezels on all sides. The screen continues to be a 3040 x 1440 resolution panel and comes with all the features that were introduced with the Galaxy S10.

The smaller Note10 display however for me is a bit let-down just for the fact that Samsung has opted to go with a 1080p panel, 2280 x 1080 to be precise. Yes, the new Note10 now represents a smaller device model and it’s straight up smaller than the Note9 and all past Note devices. However, the screen isn’t all that much smaller – it’s in effect the same dimensions as that of an S10+ which is still quite large. The fact that Samsung opted to go with a 1080p panel here just boggles my mind as a straight up downgrade for anybody coming from past Note devices. I was extremely excited to hear Samsung was going to introduce a smaller Note device (The past form-factor was a tad too big for my teste), however this screen resolution discrepancy had me lose all interest.

The only other explanation for the lower resolution screen is that Samsung has had to reduce the battery capacity of the regular Note10 to 3500mAh, whilst the Note10+ sees an upgrade to up to 4300mAh. It’s possible that the company weighed in this 22% difference and decided the two phones to have more similar battery life, sacrificing the screen on the Note10 for it.

The new design of the new Note10’s is a bit more exciting as this year it takes a lot more departures from the S-series than usual. On the front of the phone the biggest change is that Samsung has now moved over the hole-punch from the right side of the screen to the centre. It looks a bit more symmetrical now, however there’s still compromises with the design choice as the cut-out is still a larger diameter than the notification area, resulting in dead space. It’s to be noted that Samsung did not adopt the dual-camera setup of the S10+ in the Note series, which frankly in my opinion was redundant anyhow. There continues to be no notification LED anymore as Samsung seems to be pushing for always-on-display notifications (which drain more battery).

One big question about the new centre-camera setup is how Samsung will be handling the top speaker earpiece. The Galaxy S10’s earpiece was excellent serving as a high quality stereo speaker, so we’ll have to see how the new Note10 pans out in this regard.

Flipping the phone on its back, we probably see Samsung’s biggest design language departure ever. This is the first time Samsung has gone for a non-central camera positioning in its flagship devices. The result is… a bit generic and very familiar. I can’t help but draw parallels to Huawei’s P30 series here when it comes to the design as both line-ups now have exactly the same setup, including cut-outs for the flash and the new ToF sensor.

Yes, one of the new features on the Note10+, and exclusive to the + variant, is the addition of a new time-of-flight sensor. Samsung first introduced this in the 5G variants of the Galaxy S10, and it served for features such as live video bokeh effects.

At time of writing we’re not sure what the second cut-out on the Note10+ is, but when looking at the Note10, there’s an obvious lack of a feature: no heat-rate monitor. We’re not sure if Samsung has integrated this transparently under the screen, or if it’s simply another feature that hit the chopping block.

In regards to the cameras, there’s not too much news here. They’re the same setup as on the Galaxy S10 and S10+, which includes a 12MP main sensor, 12MP telephoto, and a 16MP wide-angle lens. One difference here is that the telephoto lens now has an f/2.1 aperture which is an upgrade to the f/2.4 lens of the S10.

It’s to be noted that since the launch of the Galaxy S10 earlier this year that Samsung did improve its camera software a lot. The biggest new feature is a new full-blown computational photography Night Mode that competes as among the best out there. Still, we wish Samsung did something more exciting on the camera sensor side of things such as demonstrated by Huawei, unfortunately it seems we won’t see much changes in this regard till the S11 next year.

Finally, the biggest head-scratch for the Note10’s is a sad one. Samsung has now fallen prey to the industry move to drop the 3.5mm headphone jack, and the new devices represent Samsung’s first flagship devices to ship without one. Samsung had been the last bastion of hope in this area and with the company now deciding against the versatile and robust connector. The biggest question for me now is if features such as Samsung’s Adapt Sound also got killed with it, or if the company has somehow managed to at least save one of its past selling points. It’ll be interesting to see if Samsung’s 3.5mm dongle managed good audio quality, like that of Apple’s, or if it’ll be a disaster like essentially all other Android vendors’ units.

Overall, the new Note10 series represent a departure for Samsung, and frankly I’m not sure it’s a good one. The new design of the phone is great, however I have to very much question some of the feature disparities between the new models and overall the changes and loss of some features. The smaller Note10’s 1080p screen in particular looks to be a deal-breaker for me even though it’s still a very expensive device. I was immensely happy to see Samsung deliver feature parity between the small S10 and the S10+ this year, unfortunately I just can’t say the same about the Note10 and Note10+.

The Galaxy Note10 and Galaxy Note10+ will be available in Aura Glow, Aura White and Aura Black starting from August 23rd. The Note10 comes in a 4G variant with 256GB of storage at $/€949. The Note10+ starts at $/€1099 in a 256GB model. The 512GB model costs another $/€100. The Note10+ 5G variant comes at a $200 premium and is offered in 256 and 512GB options.

Related Reading:

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • hanselltc - Thursday, August 8, 2019 - link

    P30 Pro had a clear intention of using a 1080P display for the sake of battery life. This is, well, not that.
  • cha0z_ - Thursday, August 8, 2019 - link

    Considerable? Sources? As all the sources I have and they are quite a lot (+a lot power users from XDA) that proves you wrong and that the power savings are minimalistic. They put 1440p in all their premium phone for years, literally years and on a lot smaller phones - now magically they decide to drop 1440p to 1080p on a phone costing 950 euro (note 9 was on that price - 999 euro)? They they removed the iris scanner, the heart rate sensor, the battery is really small, no 3.5mm headphone jack and so on and on. How is this not a big deal? They are literally pulling apple here with one rip off phone that makes the higher priced one that costs whooping 1100 euro (that is the real note and should had been 1000 euro).
  • janusz - Thursday, August 8, 2019 - link

    The answer is: Gear VR headset. 1440p makes a big difference.
  • Tams80 - Thursday, August 8, 2019 - link

    At that price though...
    If it were cheaper, or had more going for it, say 90Hz or 120Hz, then it would be okay.
  • lakedude - Monday, August 12, 2019 - link

    My phone has a 1440p native resolution display but the default resolution is set to 1080p. This is an ideal compromise IMHO, the best of both worlds. If you need/want the extra pixels they are there for you. If you don't care or if battery life is more of a priority you can run at the default setting of 1080p and give the video card fewer pixels to push.

    If we were talking about a $400 phone 1080p would be fine but at the high end people expect more.

    I don't really notice the difference just looking at the phone but it makes a huge difference in VR. Even 1440 is no where near enough in VR after being split between 2 eyes and then magnified by lenses. The screen door effect is terrible even at 1440p.
  • Galcobar - Wednesday, August 7, 2019 - link

    Thinking that there is a typo in the second paragraph under the Great New Screen... header: "past form-factor was a tad too big for my teste" -- unless you're referring to conflict with your anatomy when the Note is in a front pocket.
  • ** A - R ** - Wednesday, August 7, 2019 - link

    Which version of UFS do both Models use ?
  • abhaxus - Wednesday, August 7, 2019 - link

    I normally don't do this, but I lol'ed:

    "(The past form-factor was a tad too big for my teste)"
  • wrkingclass_hero - Wednesday, August 7, 2019 - link

    Lol, "The past form-factor was a tad too big for my teste"
  • CrazyElf - Wednesday, August 7, 2019 - link

    I'm disappointed by this generation of Note 10+.

    The 1080p is a let down on the non-plus version. Particularly for those who use Asian fonts and small text, it's quite noticeable next to the 1440p screens. Personally I feel that 4k on the phone would not be a gimmick and add value, even if it does hurt battery life.

    It doesn't look like the EUV SOC offers much better performance and the IPC improvement is going to be small to non-existent.

    The lack of a 3.5mm jack is very disappointing and I don't like this trend at all in the industry. So too is the microSD. I have my FLAC files on a 128GB microSD card. With NAND prices down, they are quite cheap. I purchased my 128GB microSD for $18 CAD (about $13-14 USD at current exchange rates) plus sales taxes. The lack of expandable storage and the 3.5mm jack deletion seem like a naked cash grab, to sell the high margin higher capacity phones and likely Bluetooth audio accessories, or at least force people to use USB-out DACs.

    Finally, the pricing is too high. What I'm not seeing is what this phone has going for it. Yes, the camera will probably be better, but that's about it. It's not enough to justify the pricing.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now