AMD's Full Teaser Text

On June 01, 2016 at 10 a.m. China Standard Time (3 a.m. BST / 4 a.m. CEST) the Radeon Technologies Group will be announcing:

  • Radeon™ RX 480 set to drive premium VR experiences into the hands of millions of consumers; priced from just $199
  •  First Polaris architecture-based graphics processor to deliver VR capability common in $500 GPUs; expected to accelerate the size of the VR-ready install-base and dramatically increase the pace of VR ecosystem growth
  • RadeonTM RX 480 specifications including:
  AMD Radeon RX 480
TFLOPs (FMA) >5 TFLOPs
Compute Units 36
Memory Bandwidth 256GB/sec
Memory Clock 8Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 256-bit
VRAM 4GB/8GB
Typical Board Power 150W
VR Premium Yes
AMD FreeSync Yes
DisplayPort 1.3/1.4 HDR

Set to formally launch on June 29th, the Radeon™ RX 480 will deliver the world’s most affordable solution for premium PC VR experiences, including a model that is both HTC™ Vive Ready and Oculus™ Rift™ certified and delivering VR capability common in $500 GPUs.

In a notable market survey, price was a leading barrier to adoption of VR. The $199 SEP for select Radeon™ RX Series GPUs is an integral part of AMD’s strategy to dramatically accelerate VR adoption and unleash the VR software ecosystem. AMD expects that its aggressive pricing will jumpstart the growth of the addressable market for PC VR and accelerate the rate at which VR headsets drop in price:

  • More affordable VR-ready desktops and notebooks: AMD expects that affordable PC VR enabled by Polaris architecture-based graphics cards will drive a wide range of VR-ready desktops and notebooks, providing a catalyst for the expansion of the addressable market to an estimated 100 million consumers over the next 10 years.
  • Making VR accessible to consumers in retail: Thus far, retail has not been a viable channel for VR sales as average system costs exceeding $999 have precluded VR-ready PCs from seeing substantial shelf space. The Radeon™ RX Series graphics cards will enable OEMs to build ideally priced VR-ready desktops and notebooks well suited for the retail PC market.
  • Unleashing VR developers on a larger audience: Adoption of PC VR technologies by mainstream consumers is expected to spur further developer interest across the ecosystem, unleashing new VR applications in education, entertainment, and productivity as developers seek to capitalize on the growing popularity of the medium.
  • Reducing the cost of entry to VR: AMD expects that affordable PC VR enabled by Polaris architecture-based graphics cards will dramatically accelerate the pace of the VR ecosystem, driving greater consumer adoption, further developer interest, and increased production of HMDs, ultimately resulting in a lower cost of entry as prices throughout the VR ecosystem decrease over time.

The Radeon™ RX Series launch represents the first salvo in AMD’s new “Water Drop” strategy aimed at releasing new graphics architectures in high volume segments first to support continued market share growth for Radeon™ GPUs. In May 2016, Mercury Research reported that AMD gained 3.2% market share in discrete GPUs in Q1 2016. The Radeon™ RX Series will address a substantial opportunity in PC gaming: more than 13.8 million PC gamers who spend $100-300 to upgrade their graphics cards, and 84% of competitive and AAA PC gamers. With Polaris architecture-based Radeon™ RX Series graphics cards, AMD intends to redefine the gaming experience in its class, introducing dramatically improved performance and efficiency, support for compelling VR experiences, and incredible features never before possible at these prices.

Supporting Quotes:

“VR is the most eagerly anticipated development in immersive computing ever, and is the realization of AMD’s Cinema 2.0 vision that predicted the convergence of cinematic visuals and interactivity back in 2008,” said Raja Koduri, senior vice president and chief architect, Radeon Technologies Group, AMD. “As we look to fully connect and immerse humanity through VR, cost remains the daylight between VR being the purview of the wealthy, and universal access for everyone. The Radeon™ RX Series is the disruptive technology that adds rocket fuel to the VR inflection point, turning it into a technology with transformational relevance to consumers.”

“The Radeon™ RX series efficiency is driven by major architectural improvements and the industry’s first 14nm FinFET process technology for discrete GPUs, and could mark an important inflection point in the growth of virtual reality,” said Patrick Moorhead, principal analyst, Moor Insights & Strategy. “By lowering the cost of ownership and increasing the VR TAM, Radeon RX Series has the potential to propel VR-ready systems into retail in higher volumes, drive new levels of VR content investment, and even drive down the cost of VR headsets.”

“We congratulate AMD for bringing a premium VR ready GPU to market at a $199 price point,” said Dan O’Brien, vice president of virtual reality, HTC.  “This shows how partners like AMD survey the entire VR ecosystem to bring an innovative Radeon RX Series product to power high end VR systems like the HTC Vive, to the broadest range of consumers.”

AMD Teases Radeon RX 480
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • bucketface - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    You do realise that TDP is not Power consumption right?
    1070 is going to use an 8pin power connector which should give it room to use up to 225w so it deffinitley uses more than 150w, the rx480 has a 6pin connector so max power is 150w which means it'll use less than 150w... just guestimating but i'd expect actual power usage under load of the 1070 to be between 150w & 180w while the rx480 will probably sit between 120w and 140w... anyway we will hav to wait till actual hands on reviews come out to get more exact figures but dont look at tdp as anything more than a rough guide when it comes to power use.
  • HollyDOL - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Well, at least EVGA on their site claims "Max Power Draw: 150W" ... http://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=08G-P...
  • bucketface - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Ok, having looked more closely at gtx1080 power draws, they do seem to average at about 180w, peaks are still over 200w (as an aside EVGA look to be offering an OC'd one with what they claim as max power of 215w, so looks like thay will be trying to push the limits)
    so maybe the 1070 does average around the 150w mark and just needs the extra room of the 8pin for peaks.
    That said the rx480 should be averaging somewhat less than 150w due to the limitations of the 6pin connector.
  • Meteor2 - Saturday, June 4, 2016 - link

    TDP is average maximum draw. There's no place the energy goes other than heat.
  • extide - Tuesday, June 7, 2016 - link

    Yep, all of the energy used by the GPU turns to heat. It doesnt turn into motion, or light, etc, so it MUST turn to heat. Some of the power is used by the fans, of course, but other than that, its heat!
  • at80eighty - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    ~15% less performance than a 1070 @ ~48% less price.

    it's a no brainer for those who are balancing all available factors
  • lakedude - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Exactly, nVidia is likely better but not worth the extra cost if those numbers hold up. Were I still single with disposable income I'd be buying nVidia because better. Now that I'm Al Bundy the RX480 is much more tempting because value.
  • Valantar - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Where on earth are you getting 15% less performance than the 1070 from? To quote PCPer's review of the GTX 1070: "The GTX 1070 based on Pascal is never less than 53% faster than the GTX 970 when running at 2560x1440 and is nearly twice the performance in Rise of the Tomb Raider!" They also show it performing around 50% above the 390X. The R9 390 performs roughly on par with the 970, but beats it in a few situations. This seems to be expected to slightly outperform the 390. In other words, I'd expect this to perform at 60-70% of the GTX 1070, not 85%. Even with that considered, it's good value, but nowhere near what you're saying.

    And no, I'm not an Nvidia fanboy. I've never owned an Nvidia card, and my current PC has a Fury X in it. I'm simply opposed to making bogus claims, especially ones that build up unrealistic expectations of underdogs you really want to succeed.
  • Tewt - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    I'm not sure how Anandtech measures but based on the info so far, just looking at teraflops, about 6.4 for the 1070 and over 5 for the RX480, can net you anywhere from 20% to 15% less performance. I used 5.2 teraflops(we don't know exact values yet) for AMD so a simple calculation of 5.2/6.4 gets you 81%.
  • Tewt - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    and yes, that is an oversimplification so I will still wait for actual benchmarks of retail units but just at a quick glance of the info available, I agree with at80eighty.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now